User talk:Sneakydaycrawler

Image tagging for Image:Chanker.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chanker.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Gsfds785.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Chanker.jpg. The copy called Image:Chanker.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 05:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:NEJJJJJDDEEEETTTTT.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:NEJJJJJDDEEEETTTTTt.jpg. The copy called Image:NEJJJJJDDEEEETTTTTt.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Emperor Penguin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 02:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Abraham Chempanal

A tag has been placed on Abraham Chempanal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Moonriddengirl 02:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Emperor Penguin, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Cheers, Lig hts 02:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chanker.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chanker.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:7344 B Caner002.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:7344 B Caner0021.jpg. The copy called Image:7344 B Caner0021.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:7344 B Caner002.jpg

Hi, concerning the image Image:7344 B Caner002.jpg, you said when uploading it that you had taken the picture yourself. In that case, if you wanted to release it as GFDL, I think the best licence to choose would have been {{GFDL-self}}. Someone came along and added a template to say that the image had no source. If you're uploading an image that you don't hold the copyright to, it's most important to say exactly where it came from, and what licence it has, so that others can verify it. If you upload your own images, it's sufficient to upload them with a free licence, and to say that you took the photo yourself. That counts as giving the source. It was presumably an error that the other person made, in tagging the image as having no source. I came across it when I was working my way through several hundred images categorised for speedy deletion, but I always check that there isn't a mistake, so I spotted this one. (There are so many improperly-tagged images on Wikipedia that those who are active in sorting them out can be excused for momentarily losing concentration and tagging a legitimate image as unsourced.) Perhaps it would be best to change the licence to {{GFDL-self}} just to make it extra clear. Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:News manset resim 16175 NuriSahin001.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:News manset resim 16175 NuriSahin001.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gsfds785.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gsfds785.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 04:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:7344_B_Caner002.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:7344_B_Caner002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 04:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chanker van Livegood

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Chanker van Livegood, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chanker van Livegood

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chanker van Livegood, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanker van Livegood. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:NEJJJJJDDEEEETTTTT.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NEJJJJJDDEEEETTTTT.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. So Why 12:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]