User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200802
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Snowolf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
white wolf
Is the allusion to a white wolf a subsitute for homo sapien orientated sexual satisfaction? 211.132.60.108 (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
BAG Changes
Hello. You may remember, some time ago, joining the BAG under the trial "open membership" system. Based on a lack of opposition to a reversion of this trial, I have now decided to be bold and perform it. The BAG has returned to a system under which users must go through a short period of discussion (like RfA, but less formal) before being added to the group by either a 'crat or an existing member. At the moment, I have said that discussions should last for 10 days and that community noticeboards should be spammed to encourage participation in each request - evidently this is to avoid the "cabal" impression.
As you have already been a member for some time, you're likely to be an excellent candidate to apply to the group and I encourage you to do so. Alternatively, if you totally disagree with my changes and fail to see any merit in them at all, I'm hoping to take part in discussions on WT:BAG. Though I must ask now if I may - please don't revert me without a decent amount of discussion first. Thanks, and if you have any questions about what I've done, please leave me a message, send an email or chat on IRC. Martinp23 17:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Looking for opinion
Hi there. I've seen your name pop up frequently when I'm patrolling recent changes with Twinkle. Since you're probably encountered similar situations and are an admin, I'd like to get your take on something that happened recently. A couple of days ago, I reverted this edit by an anonymous user and dropped a low level vandal warning on their talk page here. A short time later I was going through my recent contributions and happened to check back at the talk page. My warning had been erased and my name was attached to stuff written by that anon. You can see it here. Hardly libelous stuff, but it really irked me that see that. I left a nasty message (with an "only warning" tag) about forging people's names to stuff they didn't write and erased the forgery. Yeah, I probably shouldn't have cussed, but I was really pissed off by what had happened. Should I instead have simply reported him via Advanced Reporting and Vetting or something? Is forging people's names worthy of a block? The IP address seems to also be used by a "real" editor as well. How could I have handled this better? Matt Deres (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Howdy, my wife and I have been doing new page patrol and wanted to check out the NPWatcher tool. We left our names at User:Martinp23/NPWatcher/Checkpage four or five days ago, and thought we might as well nag you (again, I fear the previous poke was lost in the vandalism). Your User:Snowolf/Admin tools page is amazing, especially the warn templates and the "live" summaries. We can finally use the user warn templates sanely, now that we understand the layout (and can hover easily). The backlog is either inspiring or frightening, but I guess there's plenty to do. I've almost got a system for NP patrol, but I want to see how the tool works. We rarely use AWB for typos anymore, but it was very instructive to see how it works. JackSchmidt (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm watching this talk page, so I went ahead and did the approval. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Can we sort this out to give the candidate a fair run? Best that we revert to 3 supports and no other comments. Pedro : Chat 23:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Khalistan
The version of Khalistan I added was actually an original.
The information I added about Khalistan terrorism has always been deleted but never replaced, hence I got fed up, so I changed much of the biased religious fundamentalist dis-information back to the original version.
I would include the relative information from US State Department and UK Home Office with respect to International terrorism and would urge you not to support international religious fundamentalist based terrorism by allowing terrorists and/or there relatives to have a free print propaganda on wikipedia. Thank you - Dave Simons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.130 (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Your honorary PHD
Also, I, Snowolf, am I self proclaimed rapist with a PHD in sucking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.114.130 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 4 Feb 2008
- Can you at least add a title, my dear friend? Done in your place. By the way, which University has so kindly awarded me such a immense honour? Snowolf How can I help? 15:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Open Rights Group
I see that 129.11.218.236 (clarence-dock-pc218-236.student-halls.leeds.ac.uk) has made the Rufus Pollock -> Rufus Bollock change twice 1 and 2 and that this seem to a hall of residence IP. Do you think it would be worth having a word with someone at Leeds to see if they know the person and change havea friendly chat with them about acting like a adult? Z303 (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
How is it nonconstructive
Snowolf, How are the changes I made to governor Sebelius' home page not constructive? They are no less constructive than any news reported about Britney Spears or O.J. Simpson. Perhaps I should not have made an open request for additional information. That does not explain why you would delete information that was directly supported by facts. In effect, you are censoring current news, which is unacceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.173.152 (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- You respond to people who write horrible things about you, but not to my comments, which were far more respectful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.173.152 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 4 Feb 2008
- My apologies, it wasn't meant as disrespect. Of course your comment wasn't disrespectful in any way. To answer your question, that edit is indeed unhelpful, please source it, I see no allusion to that in the fox link. Snowolf How can I help? 19:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- The sentence in the fox link, "The site [John Sebelius' website] describes, 'Don't Drop the Soap' as a game 'Where no one playing enters through the front door!'" alludes to anal sex. I hate to discuss sexual practices since I have no idea how old you are or your about your views towards sex, but have you ever heard the term "back door sex"? It is a slang term for anal sex in both the heterosexual and homosexual communities. The wikipedia page Back door states the term "Backdoor is slang for the anus." If no one playing enters through the front door, then they would have to enter through a back door, which wikipedia acknowledges is a slang term for the anus. No other connotation would make sense if you consider the prison gates that convicts pass through to enter the prison as front doors.
- While I am at it, the term "Don't Drop the Soap" is a joke about people in prison who bend over, making themselves prone to being approached from behind and (use your imagination about back doors). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.173.152 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 Feb 2008
- No problem, I did understood the double entendre, however since it's a biography of a living person, we need a source for it rather then two of us discussing it. I mean a source which says that that game's title is a double entendre and so on. Snowolf How can I help? 19:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- My apologies, it wasn't meant as disrespect. Of course your comment wasn't disrespectful in any way. To answer your question, that edit is indeed unhelpful, please source it, I see no allusion to that in the fox link. Snowolf How can I help? 19:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
-->
- Wouldn't we have to source the statement if I said the living person was dropping the soap? I think I can find a source that says, "Don't Drop the soap" is an aphorism Wonder J I'm not just any J, I'm Wonder J!
- There, dear Snowolf, i have added citations. --Wonder J (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please block the user. And the link the user added was so vicious that, if there's a way, do something about it. I had to shut down my computer. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Somebody blocked the user. Oda Mari (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
YOU FUCKING DOUSCHE BAG BURN IN HELL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.15.199.241 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 4 Feb 2008
- That's sure :) Which circle? Snowolf How can I help? 19:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Please block 165.29.181.28
Hello! Could you please block 165.29.181.28 from further edits? I noticed several warnings on the talk page -- including a final warning -- after investigating vandalism to this talk page. Thanks! --Todeswalzer|Talk 00:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please block 68.49.6.221
Hi Snowolf, I need your help, this person with this IP address 68.49.6.221, keeps on vandalizing the NPOV "criticism", the article is "ya libnan"...his last response to me was ..."perhaps you should move to a country with a free press, like Lebanon. we the press must protect some sources to keep them from being assassinated by your regime"..I wrote back that his manner was uncilivized..
Please check this out.
the problem is , I write that "ya libnan" does not cite its sources and I prove this with references, user 68.49.6.221 says that they do and he/she cannot establish any proof70.80.188.30 (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Your Talknotice may be missing something
{{User:Snowolf/Talknotice}} item number 3 says to do so, click here but there is no link there. Just thought you ought to know.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 01:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
For the help you gave the Adelaide cabal
Page Editing
You have got to know that some 'flc fans' bully each other. That's why the person who runs the site flcnyc.co.uk should not put her/his site as a prominent flc site. It neglects the other flc fan sites. DiFontaine.net has been underplayed by 'the others' a lot while they were supporting DiFontaine.net last year and had been their 'friends' since 2003. Hope you can solve this problem. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonynonymous (talk • contribs) 21:35, 1 Feb 2008
- I am rather bemused by this comment, I am not aware of "'flc fans' bully[ing] each other" at all. The only evidence I have seen that comes close to this is the attempt to smear one of the sites in the links section of the FLC page by claiming it had malicious code. And as far as I'm aware that's the closest there has been to "bullying" and it was by the person who posted this comment *shrugs*. And for the record, it's not "person who runs the site flcnyc.co.uk" who is putting in the link to that page, it is me. I have no knowledge of who runs the site or any of the powerplays that this comment suggests have been going on. I merely put a link to what I thought was the best fan site out there in accordance to wikipedia's guidelines about fan sites. Lastly, I want to apologise to Snowolf for this bizarre state of affairs invading his talk page. Hopefully it can be resolved amicablly without any need for further admin action. I'm thinking I'm going to rewrite the article from scratch anyway, so hopefully that will take care of most of the issues. Again, apologies to Snowolf. --Stenun (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I have done extensive work bringing this article up to GA status and was about to renominate it after answering all of a GA reviewers concerns but I am having a problem with two editors trying to add the same thing. Divius and Sigpig have made the same edits to the page that have twice been reverted by a bot and twice by other editors. I have placed a nice message on their pages explaining why their edits can not be included and I would like to ask if you could please help keep an eye on this situation. Thanks. NancyHeise (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
82.6.15.4
You blocked 82.6.15.4 yesterday for 24h for vandalism. He's straight back, re-vandalising Barra here. Perhaps a longer ban is needed?MRM (talk) 21:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 23:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Why did you block User talk:89.244.191.138? he/she was removing a broken link. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Patriots Strategy
I am the original author of the article on Patriots strategy. The additions regarding allegations of cheating are vandalism and not reasonably related to an analysis of Patriots strategy. Kindly allow such provisions to be deleted.
- coppercod —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coppercod (talk • contribs) 01:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Backstreet Boys
Why did you consider the fixing of a broken image link to the previous used version as an act of vandalism? Get real 60.234.242.196 (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I should read your intro first. I believe it was an honest mistake. 60.234.242.196 (talk) 03:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Fame... wiki style.
Eww. I guess that's what we get for keeping the largest encyclopedia in the world clean and readable... just goes to show how screwed up the world is. · AndonicO Hail! 21:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
NPWatcher
Hey Snowolf, since you're a moderator on NPW can you explain to me how the autorefresh interval works? Mostly how much 1 is in real time. Thanks!--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 03:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks
RFA thanks 
:.
|
Vandalismo
Ti segnalo una forma di vandalismo che mi ha proprio contrariato: gli utenti user:THUGCHILDz e user:Guy0307 in national sport continuano a rimuovere un mio contributo che giustamente inserisce Nuova Zelanda e Galles tra le nazioni dove il rugby a 15, chiamato anche rugby union, è lo sport più popolare e inseriscono l'Australia tra le nazioni dove il cricket è lo sport più popolare ma il football australiano è lo sport di gran lunga più popolare in Australia. Questa loro versione vandalizza il mio valido contributo e uno di questi tizi si azzarda a provocarmi nella mia discussione: francamente questi due ignoranti mi hanno rotto .... la pazienza!!!! Anche le pietre sanno che in Nuova Zelanda e Galles lo sport più popolare è il rugby a 15!!!! Tu essendo amministratore potresti bloccarli o metterli totalmente al bando: adesso basta!!!!--PIO (talk) 11:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
--Meisterkoch (talk) 20:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
NPWatcher
Hey Snowolf, since you're a moderator on NPW can you explain to me how the autorefresh interval works? Mostly how much 1 is in real time. Thanks!--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 03:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- ReAdding this comment after it was lost in your archives without a reply--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 00:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Ouch!
[1] - You could've told me! Then I would've apologised. :-( In any case: my finger slipped. - Sorry for any inconvenience, friend. ScarianCall me Pat 10:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Heading
im very sorry i did this to you snowy wolf i will fiddle your fur if u dont block me ok oko.Richmcrichardson (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)rich
are you a real person? just wonderin.Richmcrichardson (talk) 14:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)rich
Barq
Excuse me but why did you say I was vanadalizing the Barq's page??????? I have all the sources to back this up. The crap they have on there now is something someone somewhere made up so I suggest you change this ASAP. How dare you say I was vanadalizing this page. I put a lot of work into writing this report up. I will report you to Wikipedia for vanadalizing this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barqs19 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 11 Feb 2008
Excuse me, but i was not constituting vandilism, and do not revert the information i correct in the regeneration of ballymun area, i know what i am writing as i live in ballymun, you have done this before and it very annoying please stop doing it. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.125.212 (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Vin Diesel Edit
Hi, sorry about the Vin Diesel edit - that wasn't suppose to save, my mistake! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.81.94 (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi Snowolf
Thanks for pointing out my mistake on the Garth Brooks article - you have prompted me to actually sign up after many years of casual, anonymous editing! I promise to provide an informative summary on every edit from now on :)
Regards. DaringFireball (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
im confused
why do u keep deleting my posts? they add to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.21.241 (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't get it
All my posts are deleted. What the heck? It's confusing because a few seconds later I get this page that say "You have vandalized the page". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.149.185 (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you (UCFD closes)
If I recall correctly, you were also the only one who closed any old discussions the last time all the admins gathered at UCFD to support their category. Horologium (talk) 01:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, I see you are an admin on the Lombard Wikipedia. What's going on over there with the mass nuking of US cities articles? I've seen at least half a dozen links to the Lombard wikipedia get removed recently, including at least one that is a GA/A-class here on en.wikipedia. (Coral Springs, Florida) Did somebody declare jihad on us, or do the deletionists have the upper hand there? (grin) Horologium (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Vote on Doczilla RfA
I noticed that you changed your support vote to oppose on the Doczilla RfA, and then later you appear to have struck the oppose. So, you now have a 'move to oppose' in the support list, but no oppose. I'm confused. Having read the queries raised by Phil, I'm wondering if you have ended up as support, oppose, neutral, abstain, or... well, I can't think of any other option off hand. Just curious. Jay*Jay (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I was about to ask. Since Phil actually changed his position to support, you struck out your oppose vote but didn't strike out the "move to oppose", so it's a little confusing. Wryspy (talk) 01:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Pulizia
Ciao capo... hai un minuto per spazzare la Remcanc? Mancherebbero una 900 di voci e poi dovremmo avere finito. Grazie e ciao, --Remulazz (talk) 13:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
| Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanz talk 04:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |  |
Doczilla's RfA
 "The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot." - Michael Althsuler
|
reverse.jpg){kind=link}
Regolamento
Questo regolamento non è chiaro comunque cercherò di rispettarlo. Quando comunichi con me, in qualsiasi discussione, considera che il mio livello di lingua inglese è 2 quindi per farti capire meglio da me devi usare la lingua italiana. Ti sergnalo questo vandalismo sulla mia pagina di utente: mi hai bloccato per ben tre giorni e non so per quale motivo allora Guy0307 merita tre mesi di blocco!!!! Caro amministratore italico spero tanto che tu controlli qualcun'altro oltre me.--PIO (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Revert or not!
Hi! I want to hear your judgment to select whose revision of Religion in China; Angelo or Saimdusan:
Thank you so much!
Angelo De La Paz (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi - I'm confused - I've been trying to create a page on our Fundy Tidal Energy project, but my edits have constituted vandalism? I don't want to touch it now, but it was me who created the page....also, it said i had copyright infringement, but I would have been loosely reproducing copy that I have written and exists elsewhere on the internet...any advice would be much appreciated.
thanks Matt Lumley Tidal Energy Project Nova Scotia, Canada —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.166.214.5 (talk) 13:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Promo negligence alert
Stenun who thinks she/he is 'running' the fun lovin criminals wikipedia page has deleted all our contributions. We have warned her but she won't get us again. Please help us!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonynonymous (talk • contribs) 21:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Sorry to bug you but could you give me feedback on my bot here. Thank you. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 16:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Your support would be nice
Dear Snowolf, I do have some interest in the article "Samir" and very often I see it distorted by some sick people. Today I edited some portion of the article and I believe it was a similar problem. Will you please go through the article and take some rational step about any naughty approach if needed! Shoovrow (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
blocked
i write one thing to help this website and i get blocked... why?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.45.157.173 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 13 February 2008
Reverting Othello
Why did you revert my statement about Othello? I can't help but notice that you contributed very little about Othello. I have a feeling that you have in your head what I added was "Vandalism." If so, what is your academic background about Othello that makes you an expert as to what should be, and not be on there?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.93.17 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 13 February 2008
UCFD
There's still a backlog : ) - If you're willing... - jc37 19:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)