User talk:Snugglewasp

Welcome!

Hi Snugglewasp! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Thanoscar21^talk_contribs 22:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Stones, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on RAF Lakenheath. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ——Serial 18:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RAF Lakenheath near nuclear disasters

Hello, Snugglewasp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RAF Lakenheath near nuclear disasters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Lucy Letby

Hi Snugglewasp, how about we have a little private discussion about the Lucy Letby web page?

I have a question to you: do you think that the article should assume she is guilty, because she was found guilty? Or do you agree that she might be innocent and hence the article should be careful to maintain a neutral point of view concerning whether or not she actually is innocent?

Richard Richard Gill (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

In this edit summary [1] you say, I’m not sure why you think you don’t have to obey the rules, and then in the talk section you said: By edit warring... So I think maybe you might like to read: Wikipedia:Bold-refine. I made an edit, and your specific objection, in the edit summary and on talk was it makes it sound like all statisticians believe this. Because you specified your objection, I addressed this in talk and in my second edit. This is how editing works, and is very clearly not edit warring. Please be more careful with your accusations in future. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)