User talk:Sonnenalle44

Hello, Collectivesoundwalk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since your username has now been changed, I have unblocked this account and you are free to edit again. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soundwalk Collective

I believe I have restored all the edits you've made. Thanks. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Sonnenalle44. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sonnenalle44. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sonnenalle44|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear drm310, there is some false understanding of my intentions. I am not on wikipedia for any financial gain, purely to share my knowledge on subjects I research in accordance to Wikipedia's formatting. I am new here so I am learning as I go along. Sonnenalle44 (talk) 11:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephan Crasneanscki (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sonnenalle44! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declaring not paid

IF you have no financial connection to the topics in question, the thing to do is to go to your User page and declare no paid relationship. Ditto denying conflict of interest IF you have no personal connection to the topics, paid or unpaid. Your denial as a response in your Talk is too obscure. David notMD (talk) 12:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am just coming back to Wikipedia now. I have declared my intentions on my user page. That should help fellow editors understand my intentions.

Sonnenalle44 (talk) 11:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those declarations. I hope your experience here is a good one. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sonnenalle44/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sonnenalle44/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sonnenalle44! You created a thread called Help on Correct Language and providing too much research at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sonnenalle44! You created a thread called Soundwalk Collective at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephan Crasneanscki (April 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Rejecting this draft. The topic isn't contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, but undisclosed paid editing is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The statement that there is no conflict of interest is incredible in the etymological sense of not worthy of belief by a rational H. sapiens.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sonnenalle44/sandbox

Hello, Sonnenalle44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Sonnenalle44/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stephan Crasneanscki

Hello, Sonnenalle44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stephan Crasneanscki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]