Jump to content

User talk:Sovereign8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alec Baldwin with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 07:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Chris Jericho. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 20:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Tgeairn. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lance Armstrong without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Use of performance-enhancing drugs in the Olympic Games with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 04:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Andy Murray, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Τασουλα (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Murray

[edit]

The Andy Murray article clearly states its content is there by long term consensus. What is there was specifically designed as a compromise. Please do not repeat your edit a third time. If you think you have new information that suggests the consensus might change then please raise the matter on the talk page. I would, however, ask you read the many and long discussions on this matter that have occurred already, so that no-one has to go over the same old arguments. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert back to "British" without discussion on the talk page. Further edits that ignore the edit note and this request may result in you being blocked. Pedro :  Chat  20:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Murray (again)

[edit]

Please consider this your final warning. Use the talk page only for discussion on Andy Murray's nationality and gain consensus for your change, or I will block you for a day. Pedro :  Chat  20:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Andy Murray shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for reverting on the article Andy Murray against consenus, requests and repeated warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Pedro :  Chat  20:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]