User talk:SpongePete2P

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hawaii Five-0 characters

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of Hawaii Five-0 characters, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://mckonoglimpse.wordpress.com/bios/steve-mcgarrett/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Hawaii Five-0 characters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Hawaii Five-0 characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from mckonoglimpse.wordpress.com/bios/steve-mcgarrett. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Winner 42 Talk to me! 04:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Hawaii Five-0 characters has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of Hawaii Five-0 characters was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://hawaiifiveo.wikia.com/wiki/Aloha_ke_kahi_I_ke_kahi_(episode), http://hawaiifiveo.wikia.com/wiki/Ua_Lawe_Wale_(episode), http://hawaiifiveo.wikia.com/wiki/I_Helu_Pu_(episode)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SpongePete2P, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi SpongePete2P!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angie Stevenson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angie Stevenson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Babysitters (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Hawaii Five-0 characters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Hawaii Five-0 characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from datab.us/i/Hawaii%20Five-0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewwikiedit. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doraleous & Associates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Doraleous & Associates, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beast Wars: Transformers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SpongePete2P. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lela Star. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The L Word into The L Word (season 3). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Compton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lauren Compton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kathy DiStefano

The article Kathy DiStefano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay go ahead.User:SpongePete2P 9:33 May 22, 2017. (NT)

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rent (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NCIS: Los Angeles (season 9)

Please do not recreate NCIS: Los Angeles (season 9) without providing substantially more sourced content than just a premiere date. With only the premiere date, WP:TVUPCOMING applies, as I earlier indicated. A note can be included in the lead of List of NCIS: Los Angeles episodes but no other content (rows in the series overview table or a section for the season) should be created. Please also note that when sections are eventually added, years are not included in section headings until episodes are aired in that year. You can read more on this in WP:TVUPCOMING and WP:TVOVERVIEW. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reception sections

Please don't add unsourced sections where you give your own personal analysis of a film or television show's reception. This should be cited to reliable sources and avoid interpretation. For example, you might quote the "critical consensus" at Rotten Tomatoes. RT gives a summary of what they believe the film's reception was, and, by quoting this, you avoid the problem of original research and synthesis. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. SpongePete2P 08:32, September 4, 2017 (ETZ)

Speedy deletion nomination of The L Word (season 5)

Hello SpongePete2P,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The L Word (season 5) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Innisfree987 (talk) 04:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay go ahead. SpongePete2P 09:32, 10 September 2017 (ETZ)

Ways to improve NCIS: Los Angeles (season 9)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. SpongePete2P, thanks for creating NCIS: Los Angeles (season 9)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Last Life (web series)

Hello, SpongePete2P,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Last Life (web series) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Life (web series) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. SpongePete2P (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2017 (PM)

November 2017

Your addition to Last Life (web series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SpongePete2P. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice Age (2002 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Court, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Johnston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Series overview tables

Please do not add 'Series overview' tables to single-season TV series, as you did at SEAL Team (TV series), as per WP:TVOVERVIEW. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, alright. I'll do what you told me to do.talk) 14:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to SEAL Team (TV series) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Note: I noticed you hadn't left an edit summary explaining why you removed a significant amount of content (23,000 bytes) from this article, but a further look at your contribs and it appears you have never attached a summary to any of the edits you've made since you joined WP. Please add a summary to every edit you make, going forward. Thank you - ^theWOLFchild 20:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauren Compton (actress)

The article Lauren Compton (actress) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Removal of content

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SEAL Team (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

Test edits

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to SEAL Team (TV series), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Page preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Note: and as has already been requested of you above, a month ago, please attach an edit summary when you make changes. Thank you - ^theWOLFchild 23:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lauren Compton (actress), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Removed unreliable references and references that fail to mention article subject. reddogsix (talk) 04:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles

Please note that there is a standing wide consensus not to split episode lists off from main TV series articles until there are at least two seasons. Some TV series require even more episodes and some are never split. The guidance on this is primarily in WP:SIZESPLIT. (note that "readable prose" is not the same as "file size"). When splitting, appropriate attribution is mandatory as this deals with copyright. Improperly attributing splits is a copyright violation. This issue has been discussed at length, if you need further information I suggest that you open a thread at WT:TV. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Compton (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lauren Compton (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at SEAL Team (TV series), you may be blocked from editing.
Note: you continue to make unexplained, mass removals of content from articles. You have been repeatedly asked to provide edit summaries to explain these edits, but it appears you have thus far never made an edit summary. You latest edit has been reverted as vandalism. If you won't explain your edits by way of a summary, then you should either respond to these warnings on your talk page or explain these edits on the article talk page. You should know that editors have been blocked from editing for refusing to communicate with others, especially when making questionable, possibly disruptive edits. So please explain what it is you are attempting to do with this article. Thank you. - ^theWOLFchild 02:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles, again

You were already notified above splitting single season tv series articles. You did it, you were reverted... why do it again? ([1] [2]) You need to start abiding the policies & guidelines here, along with standing consensus and community expectations. For example, you have yet to add a single edit summary since you joined, and you really should start communicating more on article and user talk pages. This is a collaborative project... - ^theWOLFchild 02:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Why are you converting the ratings table at SEAL Team (TV series) from using the template to the old style raw code with inappropriate colouring? Your unexplained change two days ago was reverted and yet you've made the same change again, and again without any attempt to explain why you are making these changes. If your edits are reverted you need to explain yourself. Now that it's happened twice you really need to address this on the talk page before making any more changes. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: I wouldn't expect much in way of a response. They communicate very rarely and when they do, they say very little (perhaps ESL is an issue?) There are on-going problems here that are not being addressed. Perhaps ANI is needed? - ^theWOLFchild 18:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Person of Interest Season Articles

Hi there. While doing new page patrol I see you made several seasons of Person of Interest into their own articles. They had enough content that I marked them as "patrolled" but really there should be some coverage beyond just episode listings on these pages. Things like critical reception or ratings coverage. Absent this someone would be justified in redirecting back to the list of episodes page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a requirement that attribution be provided when articles are split as explained at WP:CWW. Splitting without attribution constitutes a copyright violation. Accordingly, all of the articles, which were all split improperly, have been redirected again. Splitting requires far more than just copying content to another article. As has previously been requested of you, you really need to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines before splitting more articles. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh... Honestly, I should put my wiki contribute on hold for a while.--SpongePete2P (✉) 19:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should consider Wikipedia's Mentor Program and the Wikipedia Adoption Program. You could get some help with your editing and become a more effective contributor. Just a suggestion. - ^theWOLFchild 22:13, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at SEAL Team (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 17:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT trying to disrupt Wikipedia, I'm trying to make room for the SEAL Team (TV series). I don't like that page is crowded up. - SpongePete2P (✉) 17:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The warning above was about replacing the ratings table template with raw table code, which you have done more than once now. It was nothing to do with making space. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:00, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was clearly explained to you above that splitting articles requires that proper attribution be provided and yet you have just split content from SEAL Team (TV series) without any attempt to provide that attribution. There have been several warnings about splitting content and yet you continue to do so without any attempt to split content in accordance with our policies and guidelines. Do not do so again. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: Well, despite the warnings, they are certainly a fan of your signature... copied it exactly. Anyway, like I said before, perhaps an ANI is needed. I have suggested mentoring, maybe an ANI will help get it started.

@SpongePete2P - I have suggested to you before and I will strongly suggest it again; seek a mentor and/or adopter to help guide you and prevent you from disrupting the project further. Otherwise, there is a possibility that you may end up blocked for persistent disruption and an inability to contribute effectively. (And copying the guy's sig exactly? Why not create your own?) Like I said... just suggestions. - ^theWOLFchild 13:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SEAL Team... again

Why did you revert the redirect back to a "season 1" episode list/ article when a) the list (and everything else) for season 1 is still on the main SEAL Team (TV series) page and, b) you were already advised (how many times) not to do so? This was clearly spelled out for you, just above by AussieLegend, at "Splitting articles" and again at "Splitting articles, again".

Stop. Ask for help on the talk page before making any changes. And, again... please consider getting a mentor or adoption. Thank you - wolf 02:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could block me from making anymore ridiculous pages for a while? I would appreciate that.SP 2 September 2018 (UTC)

A block? Why can't you just not make these edits? And why don't you try the mentoring program I suggested? I think that would be a wiser option than a block. Anyway, if that is your choice, then so be it. But I can't block you, as you need an admin to do that. You can find a list of admins willing to block here. Contact one of them. - wolf 04:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you would rather be blocked than actually take any good faith steps whatsoever to change your editing behavior, then fine, but that is in itself indicative of a serious problem, so you're not just getting off with a temporary self-block and no other resolution. You're blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing; if you wish to respond constructively, and detail what specific changes you're going to make address the problems with your editing, you can detail that in a suitable unblock request. For information on how to submit a suitable unblock request, see WP:GAB. Swarm ♠ 22:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 06:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned numerous times about splitting articles without the required attribution and yet continue to do so. Please stop NOW!!! --AussieLegend (✉)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:SpongePete2P has requested he be blocked. AussieLegend (✉) 06:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First off; I want to apologize for my repulsive editing. I've hadn't had much luck trying to make good wikipedia pages lately. SpongePete2P (✉) 06:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyway for me to delete my account? Please let me know.SpongePete2P (✉) 06:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SP2P, you can't delete your account, but as a courtesy, I can blank your user talk page. It will still be saved in the page history. If you wish to return to editing, you still have to post an unblock request. Review the comments here, (you can look them up in the history), and read WP:GAB before posting, to write the best unblock request you can. Just remember, if you want to edit again, anything, it must be with this account, and only if you can get it unblocked. Editing with any other account or as an IP is not permitted. There is no guarantee you will be unblocked, but it doesn't appear you wanted to return anyway. Either way, good luck to in your future endeavors. - wolf 06:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - did you want your talk page blanked? You can do that if you like, on your own. What I probably didnt make clear before was if in the event that you were to lose talk page access, would you want your page blanked then? - wolf 04:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're now asking for your talk access to be taken away, you might want to either blank your page, or leave a state that you'd like that done in the event you lose access, since that is the closest you can get to deleting your account. FYI- wolf 01:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Black Ops 4

Can someone add in the sales segment for Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, please? SpongePete2P (✉) 06:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No can do, Pete. Per Wikipedia:PROXYING, that is not permitted. You can either try to get unblocked and add it yourself, or wait until someone else does it of their volition. - wolf 03:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added note; blocked users have access to their talk page so that they can try to get unlocked, not so that they can article edits by remote-control. Posting such requests, like the one you have here, is not a good idea as it may lead to an admin revoking your talk page access. FYI - wolf 03:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Noted. Honestly, I would prefer an admin revoked my talk page access.- SP2P 03:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Why don't you just not edit...? But, if you want your tp access revoked, you can always WP:PING one of the admins at Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks, or you can try Swarm since he's the one that blocked you in the first place. - wolf 01:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will revoke your talk page access if that's really what you want, but I don't know why you don't just request an unblock. You understand that you can do that, right? We even have a page that tells you what to do. If you'd rather just "erase" your account, you have the "right to vanish", and I will help you vanish your account instead if that's what you want. You don't have to permanently leave Wikipedia if you don't want to. Let me know. Swarm talk 02:09, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]