User talk:Sriharsh1234

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sriharsh1234. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Coren ^(talk) 22:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sriharsh1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for puppeting. I promise that I will never puppet if you unblock me. Trust me I will never use multiple account to vandalize Wikipedia. and please assume good faith on me. Am I site banned or topic banned? I promise, I will make constructive edits and will never use abusive multiple accounts if you unblock me. Please give me one chance to make constructive edits. Sriharsh1234 12:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are banned from this site by community decision.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sriharsh1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What will happen if:-
You unblock me: I will make constructive edits and stop using abusive multiple accounts and donate INR 10000 as sign of my good faith.
If you decline this request and revoke my talk page access: If you DARE to decline this request and revoke my talk page access then I will start using abusive multiple accounts and will leave no traces ie editing patterns etc. And you cannot prove that I am using multiple accounts even by checkuser because I have over 1000 IPs. I will vandalize every page if you dare to revoke my talk page access. So consider unblocking me. Sriharsh1234 14:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Absolutely not. We don't EVER deal with such ultimatums.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked.

We don't take kindly to threats. You can't be unblocked by a single admin anyway, you are community banned. You need to request an unblock by Arb. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chalao Na Naino Se

The article Chalao Na Naino Se has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

3 liner page does not need separate article. Better merge it with parent article. Again, merge proposal is pending since oct 2012!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Vivvt • (Talk) 06:48, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ajay Devgan and Asin in Chalao Na Naino Se.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ajay Devgan and Asin in Chalao Na Naino Se.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amrit Manthan new logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Amrit Manthan new logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amrit Manthan new logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Amrit Manthan new logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]