User talk:Staban
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Signs (International Journal of Semiotics), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/libraryintelligencer/2009/09/17/signs-international-journal-of-semiotics. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Here are no copyright issue. Text belongs to Signs and can be verified at http://vip.db.dk/signs/index.htm --Staban (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Signs (International Journal of Semiotics)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Signs (International Journal of Semiotics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Status and Advice
[edit]As reviewing administrator, I rescued the article, but you've got to do things a little more carefully. Please read WP:COPYRIGHT--all material on the web is assumed to be copyright unless specifically stated otherwise. And then take a look at our Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. It would be usualy for a journal that new to be notable, but not impossible. Are there any articles that have been cited to a substantial extent? DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- The journal is new (2007) and very important in its field. Its open source policy is quite self-explanatory in regards of Copyright issue. Quality of publications, editorial board, peer review status are presenting the academic level, which need to be noticable by Wiki. imho.--Staban (talk) 09:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Signs (International Journal of Semiotics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Relatively new journal, no indications yet of notability. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- By creating the article I did't mean to compromise Wiki, neither to gain something for myself. So, delete it if nessesary.--Staban (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Signs (International Journal of Semiotics)
[edit]I have nominated Signs (International Journal of Semiotics), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signs (International Journal of Semiotics). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crusio (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)