User talk:StanleyKey
Welcome!
|
March 2017
[edit]Please stop adding plagiarized text to the Patrick Mannelly. Your contribution,[1][2] “Mannelly immediately took over long-snapping duties and pulled the trigger on 2,282 long snaps during his career.” Is copied from chicagobears.com. Please attempt to paraphrase. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Patrick Mannelly, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission.
Any addition to Wikipedia needs to be properly cited by a reliable source. Fan blogs, self-published articles, or forums are not reliable sources, and these edits will be removed and your editing privileges will be suspended. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 17:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Chris Tabor moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Chris Tabor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Dial911 (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Jason Loscalzo
[edit]Hi. I just spent ages writing you a long reply explaining the deletion, only to have it disappear when my internet connection went down! So I will have to start again. I admit I'm not an expert on American sport, but it seemed to me that Jason Loscalzo didn't meet the criteria described in Wikipedia:Notability (sports). You'll see that there can be an exception made if the subject of the article is "the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." Unfortunately you only provided one source, and the rest of the article was unreferenced.
There are a few other problems I noticed. There were a few subjective statements, such as "He's of a modern mindset", which contravene the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. Also, the personal details about Loscalzo make me wonder whether you are acquainted with him outside wikipedia; if you are, there is a potential conflict of interest. This doesn't necessarily mean you can't create the article, but it does mean you have to conform absolutely to the NPOV rule. There is nothing to stop you trying again, but do be aware that the article can be deleted at any time if it meets A7 or any other of the speedy deletion criteria.
In your query on my talk page, you talked about "the decline of the submission", but the fact is you didn't submit this as a draft, you uploaded it to article space. If you are thinking of recreating it, you could try creating it as a draft and get some feedback on it.Deb (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, I have put the text in your userspace for now. On your other point, do read Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Deb (talk) 14:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Andre Tucker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JTtheOG (talk) 06:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit]
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 00:25, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit] We appreciate your contributions, but in this edit to List of American and Canadian football leagues adding unsourced "unofficial" tiers, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 12:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gridiron Developmental Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Halas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York Titans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago Bears, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Connor and Joe Fortunato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of proposed cities for American football minor leagues for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of proposed cities for American football minor leagues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of proposed cities for American football minor leagues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
UCF national championship
[edit]Hi!
I noticed you recently made an edit on the American Athletic Conference page concerning UCF's football national championship. However, the table that you added it to is not the appropriate place for it, as FBS football is outside the scope of NCAA sanctioned activities. No other conference lists their FBS national championships. If you want to discuss this edit, feel free to head over to the talk page.
Esb5415 (talk) 01:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fan Controlled Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Sherman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Fan Controlled Football League for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fan Controlled Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan Controlled Football League (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia-Carolina Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carolina.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Roquan Smith. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United States Football League (2022) into 2022 USFL season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of 2024 XFL season for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 XFL season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Esolo5002 (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)