User talk:StarBR

StarBR, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi StarBR! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Combs Enterprises

Hello StarBR,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Combs Enterprises for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie Sainsbury

Hello StarBR,

I wanted to engage you in a conversation about this article. According to Wikipedia:Notability (people), "A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured." The convenience shortcut is WP:PERP.

When I quickly read your article, I saw the story of a young woman notable (perhaps) only for being arrested as a drug mule. Another relevant section is WP:BLP1E, our policy regarding biographies of people known for only one event.

The alleged crime in question is ubiquitous and hundreds of thousands or millions of people have faced similar charges. We routinely delete biographies of murderers convicted of killing one or two people for common reasons. Most experienced editors would expect some highly unusual aspect in order to have an article about a specific crime (or criminal) like this.

I could aggressively seek speedy deletion of this article, but based on your Teahouse comment, I fear that this would alienate you. So, instead I want to tell you that you seem to have the potential to become a productive Wikipedia editor, if you select your article topics more carefully. So, please study the relevant policies and guidelines, and decide whether you would contest or agree to deletion of this article. I am doing my best to extend to you the respect that you deserve. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cassie Sainsbury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cassie Sainsbury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie Sainsbury until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neiltonks (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gillian Greene (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't seem notable enough for a biography on Wikipedia. Please read the criteria and add more details e.g. national or international awards won.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gillian Greene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gillian Greene, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gillian Greene concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gillian Greene, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gillian Greene

Hello, StarBR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gillian Greene".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]