User talk:Stuartfost
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Stuartfost, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- John Broughton (♫♫) 14:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Cookies for you
[edit]
|
Cookies! | |
|
Here are some cookies as a way of saying "thank you" for contributing to our project. Keep up the good work! Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC) has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! |
Current Family of Beers
[edit]Core Beer Products
| Beer Title | Year First Introduced | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Samuel Adams Boston Lager® | 1984 | This deep amber color lager is brewed using only four ingredients and traditional brewing methods. |
| Sam Adams Light® | 2001 | Brewed using only two-row malted barley and Bavarian Noble hops, Sam Adams Light has a malt character that is balanced with the citrus fruit notes of the Noble hops. |
| Samuel Adams® Boston Ale | 1987 | Specially brewed, fermented, and aged in the stock ale tradition, imparting citrus aromas and a full-bodied taste. This classic American Ale was first brewed to celebrate the opening of the Boston brewery. Classic English ale hops, East Kent Goldings, and Fuggles are added to the beer, giving it an earthy, herbal character. Its red amber color and glow come from the two-row Harrington and crystal malts. |
| Samuel Adams® Pale Ale | 1999 | Brewed in the classic style with English ale hops and roasted specialty malts. Fuggles and East Kent Goldings hops impart a dry finish to this ale. |
| Samuel Adams® Cherry Wheat | 1995 | Combines Michigan cherries with a large portion of wheat malt. A small amount of honey enhances the natural sweetness of the fresh cherries. |
| Samuel Adams® Cream Stout | 1993 | A true cream stout, balancing body and sweetness with the natural spiciness of malted barley and English hops. The Samuel Adams brewers use roasted chocolate and caramel malts as well as unroasted barley to impart a fullness of
body and a roasted malt character. |
| Samuel Adams® Scotch Ale | 1994 | This ale is brewed with three special malts, including rare peat-smoked malt that is kilned in Scotland and used in Scotch whiskies. This malt gives Scotch Ale a subtle, smoky flavor and a deep amber hue. |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of BCC Research for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BCC Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCC Research (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Crowdspring for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crowdspring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdspring (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Crowdspring
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Crowdspring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 16:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TestFreaks Logo.PNG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:TestFreaks Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Dartboston.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of TestFreaks for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestFreaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.