User talk:Sudhanshu6454

Welcome!

Hello, Sudhanshu6454! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Sukhwant Dhadda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sukhwant Dhadda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andy Von Eich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Von Eich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Von Eich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 12:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Von Eich

Hello Sudhanshu6454,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Andy Von Eich for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jbh ^Talk 20:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Surani Pictures

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Surani Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sudhanshu6454 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17997 was submitted on Apr 10, 2017 06:23:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Amin Surani

Hello, Sudhanshu6454,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Amin Surani should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Surani .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

L3X1 (distant write) 15:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

Anyone reviewing any future unblock requests, please see User talk:SudhanshuKumar1. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhanshu6454 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

According to Wikipedia guidelines I think I have not violated any rules. All I have created you can find on google search. They are notable personality. If anything violated really sorry for that. It was totally unintentional. Articles I have added on Wikipedia with relevant references please check the references before taking any action.I have been blocked in the past because I was new to Wikipedia. I request to unblock but I did not got any response. I have added several images with all rights no can claim copyright. Check my all edits 90% articles are valid information and I never tried to manipulate any articles. Please go through my edits. Sudhanshu6454 (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate. MER-C 11:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block reason (which you can seen here) is for "(1) copy and pasting from sources (2) using Wikipedia to advertise. Before you can return to editing you also need to follow WP:PAID", and you have not addressed either of those. You have further violated Wikipedia WP:Sock puppet policy by creating the User:SudhanshuKumar1 account and continuing your promotional editing with that while further violating WP:PAID policy. You will need to address all of these things if you want to have any chance of being unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhanshu6454 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Eplaination 1.Copy and pasting thing happened while was i learning and i'm really sorry for that mistake. Now you can see i totally understand wikipedia doesnt allow copy pasted content. Beacuse i have edited and created so many articles without any copy and past. Explanation 2. Advertise thing, that a year ago. Now you can check that i never tried to advertise anything. Whatever i had written all are with references and relevant sources. Explaination 3. Since I'm digital marketing guy i manage many bollywood client, So i have to edit on behalf of my clients. i really dont know how to exlain this. Please suggest. I can contirbute alot if you guide me. Sudhanshu6454 (talk) 09:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. If you had to bothered find out about the goals of this project before editing, you would quickly realise that being an reliable encyclopedia whose readers expect independent coverage of the subject matter and a digital marketing medium are mutually exclusive. You also need to learn some basic media ethics (but do not assume we allow it here, we don't). Consider this an explicit rejection of your offer to "contribute", with which I mentally substituted "pollute this website with marketing bullshit". MER-C 11:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Since I'm digital marketing guy i manage many bollywood client, So i have to edit on behalf of my clients" is textbook promotion/advertising/WP:COI and a very clear example of WP:PAID, and you have still not addressed your failure to abide by those policies. You have also still not addressed your WP:Sock puppetry. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
More at [1].--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:50, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhanshu6454 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank You are so much for guiding me. Point 1. I have edited more than hundred times you can check that and i never tired to advertise. Whatever information was in news/media or in public domain i edited according to that only. Point 2. WP:Sock puppetry i was blocked. I tried to explain and said sorry too. But no unblocked me. That's why I created another account. That time I was learning how to do proper edit in Wikipedia. at last, I just want to say I made mistakes and really sorry again, my intention was never to advertise. You can check my edits.Sudhanshu6454 (talk) 13:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For point 1, you've already stated, "Since I'm digital marketing guy i manage many bollywood client, So i have to edit on behalf of my clients". For point 2, you have no excuse for creating another account. Given your history of violations, there's no chance you'll be unblocked at this time. Yamla (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhanshu6454 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its been along i am looking for an unblock of my account. i think the sole reason behind being blocked for such longtime is just because i have been so honest to wiki fraternity. believe me i wont in any way use my account as marketing personalSudhanshu6454 (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Time served" is not in itself a reason to unblock your account. Before you can be unblocked, you will need to properly address the issues that led to the block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.