User talk:Sunilbutolia

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunilbutolia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of Wikipedia's COI policy, I also was not aware that disclosing about employer and client is very important in case of paid articles, so kindly unblock me. I am on wikipedia for long time, but wrote paid articles within last week ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 21:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

Decline reason:

You outright lied to us. You have demonstrated we cannot trust your word. It looks like you are still lying to us (see below). As such, we cannot unblock you. The community needs to be able to trust the word and the actions of the editors, and you worked hard to make sure we can't trust yours. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunilbutolia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have genuinely and honestly added my paid articles here, I denied earlier that I don't write for money because I thought if I disclose, Wikipedia will take legal action against me. But as I read on COI page then I was convinced to disclose honestly. So kindly unblock me. In future I will avoid this type of behavior and follow Wikipedia guidelines. I hope I will be unblocked soon. Earlier I was blocked on wikimedia commons for 7 days for choosing wrong copyright during uploading image which is available on internet. After that incident, I avoid uploading image there, I only upload which I taken with my camera. ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 13:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

Decline reason:

I seriously doubt that unblocking you will help Wikipedia – you're just going to continue to abuse our website by posting promotional autobiographies, engaging in paid editing without disclosure, and moving promotional drafts into mainspace. You'll have to work to convince us of your competentence and trustworthiness, and I'm honestly not sure how you'd do that. Maybe try the standard offer and follow the advice there about editing other projects constructively. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nonsense behavior of Wikipedia Admins

I am wondering to see that admins has inserted (paid article) template on all my articles. It prove wikipedia is not justified platform, thats why wikipedia is not a verifiable source to check information. I honestly disclosed 4 paid articles but they put paid template on all my articles which I created to uplift my community for free. this is not a good thing, now I dont trust wikipedia and its admins. I hate this platform by now. Also I request admins to delete my account permanently.☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 10:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

Hmm. Unfortunately, wikipedia accounts can not be deleted. Also, on scholarly level or, people say wikipedia is not a reliable source because it can be edited by anybody. Also, I dont think a one can remove block notice if still blocked. Pinging previously uninvolved Yunshui. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I placed the block so I'm not exactly uninvolved... but you are correct, accounts cannot be deleted, and declined unblock requests cannot be blanked (I have duly restored them, above). Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But why you added that (paid) template to all my previous articles which were not involved in paid promotion? Whose articles I created they don't even know me, never contacted me then how it is justifiable to putting paid template on those on just the basis of doubt?. This is disgusting and not acceptable, it will create much confusion for readers who visit Wikipedia to get information...☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 10:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

Because a) you claimed to have been paid for those articles and b) you have lied to us repeatedly and so there is no reason for us to believe that you are now telling the truth about not knowing these article subjects. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My unblocking request was removed

My unblocking request (3rd attempt) was removed by someone from my talk page. They want me to block me for lifetime while I already have disclosed information about paid articles honestly. Now they are treating all my articles as paid. its very nonsense behavior and not acceptable. ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 10:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

That "someone" is you (special:diff/939571069). Such lying is not acceptable. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:39, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stalking my personal life

Wikipedia admins/editors (Neo Seventh) are stalking my personal life, including my website, social media profiles and also contacting me on Google hangout to find out what services I am providing. Very nonsense thing I have ever seen. :D lol ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 10:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

People using wikipedia and wikidata to make money

Hey I am not alone here! you should take action against all users who are making money from your platforms. please read this article, what Tony Edward is doing on wikidata and wikipedia?. There are thousand of people who are doing this but you target innocent people who dont know wikipedia's policies. Thanks ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 12:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

There are indeed a lot of undisclosed paid editors out there trying to promote their clients on Wikipedia; it is the single biggest problem that the encyclopedia currently faces. We target anyone who does this (the articles mentioned in that Tony Edward column, from 2015, were deleted shortly after the column itself was published). You are hardly innocent; you said yourself that you thought what you were doing might actually be grounds for legal action (it isn't, yet, although the current Status Labs case may change that), but that didn't stop you! Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear I just want to let you know that I just created recent 4 articles for paid, but all my previous articles are voluntary work for my Khatik community, I certify that, I am telling truth. I want you to take same action against all. I already promised you to not creating paid articles but you are not trusting. ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 03:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

Blocked for undisclosed paid articles

Recently, I was involved in paid editing which I undisclosed. I know its my fault, I should have disclose such information to comply with wikipedia guidelines. I am editing wikipedia since long time and like to contribute, So I request senior admins to give me this last chance, I will not do such things again. That client was my friend and forced me to do that. But now I swear I will not edit wikipedia in return of money. I certify that articles which I created before December-2019 were not created in return of money. Thank You ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 11:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia[reply]

"Kalpit Veerwal" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kalpit Veerwal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 24#Kalpit Veerwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zoodino (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hemanth Muddappa

Hello, Sunilbutolia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hemanth Muddappa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shraddha Sonkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shraddha Sonkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shraddha Sonkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil butolia sir make an article for wikipedia improving help

Draft:Krodh film (2019) improving this article and moved the draft in to krodh film (2019) Main Page Sagar10km (talk) 03:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]