User talk:Survivathor
Welcome, fellow video game enthusiast!
[edit]
|
Suggested WikiProjects
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e0/WPVG_icon_2016.svg/40px-WPVG_icon_2016.svg.png)
Hey Survivathor—thanks for your recent contributions. I noticed your interest in Wikipedia's video game content and thought you might be interested in the video games WikiProject. We've done some great work (over 250 pieces of Featured content and over 800
Good articles), but there is plenty more to do. Come say hello on our talk page, participate in our current events, or let me know if I can help with anything. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope I'll see you around. -- ferret (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Category use...
[edit]Hi there. I appreciate your interest in improving Wikipedia, but I think some of your category placement is a bit off. There's two parts.
- Please read over WP:CATDEF and WP:DEFINING. The short version is that when you add a category to an article, it should be a defining characteristic of the article. Not just a minor/passing aspect to it. So, for example, I don't think this was the best choice - while there are some allusion to Hitler and Nazis in the game, but Persona 2 on a whole is not focused entirely around Nazi Germany. It would not be defined as such, so the category doesn't really belong...
- I think your understanding of alternate history as a genre is a bit off as well. Alt history isn't just any game that covers a fictional event in a real world setting. It's really more when games (or any media) focus on a fictional "what if" scenario, where something goes differently than planned, and showing how it would be different. In the genre, they really explore how things play out differently. There's usually an obvious comparison point between what happened in real life, and what the fiction covers of what could have happened. So, if a game covered what happened if World War 2 never happened? Great example. But Parasite Eve (video game)? Castevania: Lords of Shadow 2? That's not the same, either conceptually, nor do they belong due to reasons covered in point number 1...
Let me know if you have any questions. Sergecross73 msg me 21:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks I appreciate the constructive feedback. Have now followed your advice.Survivathor (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Survivathor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)