User talk:Susanowoo

Welcome!

Hello, Susanowoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Paulo Jorge Silva, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 20:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paulo Jorge Silva

The article Paulo Jorge Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 20:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know the right numbers of the players I changed and I add a player who was forgotten

Proposed deletion of Moro Lamine

The article Moro Lamine has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have put a lot of sources about Lamine Moro , I think it is enough to keep the article no ?

Proposed deletion of Abubakar Mutawakil

The article Abubakar Mutawakil has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abubakar Mutawakil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abubakar Mutawakil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abubakar Mutawakil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Abdoul Aziz Keita Awarded.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Abdoul Aziz Keita Awarded.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gheorge-Cornea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gheorge-Cornea.jpg, which you've attributed to Sister of Gheorghe Cornea. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Susanowoo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Chavda Maisha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me precisely what I wrote who is considered as advertising. I admit that the picture of the player was taken by myself because I work for a Blog specialized in African Football. This picture was never published in a site except Wikipedia.

Nowhere in the above message accuses you of advertising. Note the message states "if you have an external relationship..." I saw you had taken and uploaded a picture (File:Maishachavda.jpg) that appears to be of a personal nature, and had included some relatively trivial details. If you indeed have no professional or personal relation to the subject, then please accept my apologies for presumption, and carry on. Note also that if you work for a blog, the COI guidelines can apply to that publication (see WP:SELFCITE): assuming it is a reliable source, you may cite it within reason, as long as it is not excessive, promotional, etc. Lastly, as a general recommendation for the article Chavda Maisha and all articles, verification would be greatly improved by adding inline citations. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Iliuciuc

Il faudrait peut être penser à alier cette pagge : Page anglophone à son homologue roumaine Page roumaine

Le titre des pages sont différentes mais c'est bien la même personne

Sources

Please add your sources to Christ Konan. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christ Konan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christ Konan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ Konan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]