User talk:Sussex Wolves

This user may have left Wikipedia. Sussex Wolves has not edited Wikipedia since June 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Sussex Wolves, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stephan Katt, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nthep (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephan Katt

The article Stephan Katt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nthep (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Sussex Wolves", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be that of an organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. If your name is that of an organization, and you want it as part of your username, you can format it as "YourName of SussexWolves" or something similar. You don't have to use your real name, just something to indicate that only you are using this name. 331dot (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My username is combination of where I live and the football team I support. There is no organisation involvement at all.

Thanks for the clarification, and I apologize for disturbing you. 331dot (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries

Photographs

Hi, could I have some help please. How do I upload photographs. Cheers for any help

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew appleton

Hello Sussex Wolves,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Andrew appleton for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ^{^en:User:}Rtrust_(talk) 18:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm happy for the page to be deleted.

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 Individual Long Track World Championship

Hello Sussex Wolves,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2015 Individual Long Track World Championship for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbdave (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Appleton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Andrew Appleton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sussex Wolves. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Bellego (speedway rider)

The article David Bellego (speedway rider) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Bellego (speedway rider)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Bellego (speedway rider) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Bellego (speedway rider)

The article David Bellego (speedway rider) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (European Grasstrack Championship) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating European Grasstrack Championship, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article - it's appreciated. It's just been reviewed. Could you please look it over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Andrew Appleton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Andrew Appleton, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks. Wikiprojects have been added to the talk page -- would you mind adding wikiprojects on future articles you create so as to attract the attention of interested editors.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Shanes) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Shanes, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi there. Could you please review WP:NMOTORSPORT and WP:GNG if you haven't already done so. Given he's won multiple grasstrack championships, Shanes may well pass, but you should at least be aware of these standards since not all series are considered sufficient to establish notabilty, and you should be prepared if there's debate down the track. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zdenek Schneiderwind

The article Zdenek Schneiderwind has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Dunker

The article Tommy Dunker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tommy Dunker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tommy Dunker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klaus Lausch

The article Klaus Lausch has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way of sourcing this sort of information as it comes from Grasstrack, Speedway and Longtrack Programme's and websites. If I could I would. That why I always link it to www.grasstrakgb.co.uk because that is my website.

A page you started (Klaus Lausch) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Klaus Lausch, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please stop creating articles without references or indication of why they are notable.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way of sourcing this sort of information as it comes from Grasstrack, Speedway and Longtrack Programme's and websites. If I could I would. That why I always link it to www.grasstrakgb.co.uk because that is my website.

A page you started (Ales Dryml, Sr) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ales Dryml, Sr, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Per WP:INCITE: Citations are especially desirable for statements about living persons. You are repeatedly creating articles on living people that are creating work for others by a lack of sources, a lack of inline sources or a lack of clear notability. You have already been asked to slow down and reference correctly, and I repeat that. Thanks for wanting to contribute - it would take you not much extra time to get it right from the start, but the WP:BURDEN for a basic level of sourcing is on the creator.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way of sourcing this sort of information as it comes from Grasstrack, Speedway and Longtrack Programme's and websites. If I could I would. That why I always link it to www.grasstrakgb.co.uk because that is my website.

A page you started (Dirk Fabriek) has been reviewed!

I see on Dirk Fabriek you added an inline tag yourself on its creation. This is likely to remain there indefinitely, scarring what would otherwise be a good article. No one else can easily work out which source was used where, but you, as the person who looked them up, would be able to do this with little trouble. It means it can never be classed as a good or featured article too. I repeat that the WP:BURDEN is on you to cite properly. Boleyn (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way of sourcing this sort of information as it comes from Grasstrack, Speedway and Longtrack Programme's and websites. If I could I would. That why I always link it to www.grasstrakgb.co.uk because that is my website.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sussex Wolves. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Mallory Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ron Jones

Wolverhampton Olympique (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jesper Jensen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mallory Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Hagon

Hello, Sussex Wolves. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Martin Hagon, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Martin Hagon to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Nick Moyes (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Trevor Banks) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Trevor Banks, Sussex Wolves!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please clean upthe naked URLs. For more information, please see WP:CITE

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Josef Franc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roden and Richard Wolff

Michal Dudek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roden and Richard Wolff

Mathieu Trésarrieu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herxheim

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michal Dudek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roden and Richard Wolff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dimitri Bergé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herxheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please add references to all articles you create. All articles must have references, especially biographies of living people - they need to be inline, see WP:INLINECITE. You have added 'external links' but external links just means suggestions for further reading and doesn't tell us what your sources were. You have been contacted about referencing issues many times. Please ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE if you need help or look at Help:Referencing for beginners or WP:V. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication

Oh dear, Sussex Wolves, you are continuing to create biographies of living people with no clear sources despite previous warnings. Please add WP:INLINECITED sources to Kurt W. Petersen. Please see the links above and also [[WP:CONDUCT] ]and WP:DISPUTE - communication is mandatory when other editors raise concerns. Please work with us. Boleyn (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also Don Godden. Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theo Pijper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noordwolde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication (again)

All your articles can be sourced, e.g. if your article was a page on Speedway, you WP:INLINECITE a link to that page on the Speedway website. That is then it referenced/sourced. Do you understand? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You are risking a block by continuing to ignore messages from other editors raising concerns. Have you looked at WP:INLINECITE and know how to add inline citations? Can you do this for the articles you create, in particular for biogrpahies of living people? Boleyn (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sussex Wolves. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find it disgusting that you have removed my work. My work is one hundred percent perfect and for you to say to me after as many as forty years research its not reliable is not good enough. There is plenty of rubbish on Wikipedia that are blatant lies. I have changed many many wrong on Wikipedia. Much of my work can not be sourced because its information I have collected over years. Would you like me to put my name and address or would that not be reliable enough for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sussex Wolves (talk • contribs)

@CASSIOPEIA: ↑ Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamy Jazz Thank you.

Hi Sussex Wolves, Greetings. I didnt delete your page nor removed your article. I moved the page to "draft space", for you add sources unto the page. The guidelines of Wikipedia for a page to be merited a page, the subject needs to be notable, and the content claimed need to be supported by multiple independent, reliable sources where by the sources for verification. Sources such as from major newspapers and books are good sources and sources can be any languages. There are thousands of articles in Wikipedia which notable in Wikipedia as all the editors are volunteers and reviewers are limited, and many of these articles have yet to come to notice of the editors either to improved them or to nominate them to be deleted. If an article does not pass the notability guidelines, no matter how many years the article is in the Wikipedia mainspace, it would be subject for article for deletion if an editor find the notability is in question. Only articles truly pass the notability guideline will permanently stay i Wikipedia mainspace. Pls note the draft page will stay in Wikipedia system for 6 months before it is nominated for deletion, you have 6 months to find the sources. Lastly pls read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything for further information. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01 (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have not addressed the concerns of CASSIOPEIA, as the source you added does not support the information here. You need to cite your sources with inline citations, as then you will be able to ensure what you write can be sourced. Currently this draft is as good as unsourced, as the first external link does not support anything in the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sussex Wolves! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kai Huckenbeck

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kai Huckenbeck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Mustonen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jesse Mustonen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:05, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mustonen (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mustonen (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please read WP:REFB for help with formatting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Smolinski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Mustonen (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You still have not used the required incline citation format which means the references and external links cannot be used by readers to verify the article contents. Please follow the linked format. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jesse Mustonen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01

Hello, Sussex Wolves. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Staffordshire Senior Cup 1900-01".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jesse Mustonen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jesse Mustonen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jesse Mustonen

Hello, Sussex Wolves. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jesse Mustonen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andre Pollehn

The article Andre Pollehn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1899–1900 Staffordshire Senior Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1899–1900 Staffordshire Senior Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1899–1900 Staffordshire Senior Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]