User talk:TBHecht

Welcome!

Hello, TBHecht, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony 16:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User page

"re-BEL", hm? I wonder what the etymology of that name is.

Anyway. I'd like to suggest that you take a minute and create yourself a user page, so as to better distinguish yourself from the new-and-flyby accounts. Just tell us a little bit about yourself.

Looking forward to reading more of your work. DS 14:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antoine Forqueray

An interesting piece, to which it would be a good idea to add a source. Best, Staffelde 02:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M. Dubourg

Hello TBHecht: Thank you, for die Vervollständigung des Artikels, auf meiner Userpage findest du weitere Komponistenstubs die auf Erweiterung warten. Meistens habe ich einen Text im Deutschen oder Französischen Wiki geschrieben. Wenn du Lust hast ......, Greatings from Belgium - Frinck51 12:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Francesca Lebrun

Could you please add some more specific information to the page, such as specific places she has performed, awards she has won, who she worked with/for, etc? Some guy 18:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Adam Guilain

Thank you so much for helping! Gérard 13:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medical genetics

I haven't see you so far. I saw your edit in the Karyotype article and took a look at your user page. Maybe you could be interested in the WikiProject Medical Genetics. If you have any question, don't hesitate to contact me. Good work! NCurse _work 19:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

list of geneticists

Very nice indeed. Where are you getting them from? categories? Would you care to try some other biological sciences--they all need improvements-- DGG 19:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I ask because it may serve as a example for the other such lists.DGG 04:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

J. Edwin Seegmiller

I just want to say thanks for helping with the article on J. Edwin Seegmiller. I started it after I met his wife a few weeks ago (she lives near me and goes to the same church as I do). When she found out that I was from the same small town as he was she began to tell me about him. It turned into a long conversation when she also found out that I had studied biochemistry as an undergrad, was now pursuing a phd at ucsd, and that I also had worked at the NIH. I'll let his wife know about the article you helped write.--Nate 20:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sex determination

Perhaps you could take a look at sex determination system and the linked subpages. Am I wrong in finding them rather trivial,with inadequate detail, documentation, and perhaps understanding? (I'm also not sure of the standard nomenclature these days--my last encounter was in teaching them to undergraduates 2 or 3 decades ago, and I relied a lot on Curt Stern's textbook, as most of what I knew on the subject was about E. coli.).DGG 22:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

N.H. Horowitz

DGG suggested I might contact you to ask your opinion. I am thinking about writing about Norman H. Horowitz, Caltech biology professor, previous department head etc. One can find some material about him:

And a huge number of publications. Comments? Suggestions?--Filll 21:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am pondering it. I only thought I would ask since I have been running into a lot more deletions than normal lately. And so I want to be sure he is notable before I put any effort int it.--Filll 17:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Please take a look at Talk:Sergio Fiorentino. Thank you. --Otheus 23:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The changes in the article on Sergio Fiorentino look good. Thank you for the excellent editing. -- TBHecht, 15 April 2007

Conductors category

You've added a lot of pages to the "conductors" category, even though they are already in some sub-category such as "American conductors". We generally only add an article to the most specific category possible: see Wikipedia:Categorization_and_subcategories. Grover cleveland 08:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arizona (1940 film)

Thanks for fleshing out the article on this film. I was watching this along with my mom, and decided to look it up on WP to check out a cast member, and realized that the "Arizona (film)" linked to a different movie, so I disambiguated the two into separate articles and left the 1940 film to work on later. You saved me some work, and did a good job. I added the bit about Old Tucson Studios; a group I was with visited the park about a month ago, and a guide mentioned this film. Thanks again! Realkyhick 02:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elgar's Falstaff - we few, we happy few!

How good to know that someone else cares! (Excellent additions, too, if you'll allow me to say so). Tim riley 18:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pietro Antonio Fiocco

Bonjour TBHecht, Happy New Year. J'ai vu que vous avez pris en 2006 l'article francais comme base de l'article en anglais. Il contient deux trois erreurs. J'ai changé l'essentiel. Si vous avez l'envie et ou le temps, vous pouvez regarder de:Pietro Antonio Fiocco pour avoir les informations complémentaires, que je viens d'ajouter. Mes sources sont, le Dictionnaire des compositeurs de Belgique et un livret de CD ou l'article est rédigé par un musicoloque belge de l'université de Bruxelles, homme proche de théatre de la monnaie. Pour réponse éventuelle de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Frinck. bien a vous -- frinck (talk) 08:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Hi. Thank you for your report, but would you please be more specific about which Account(s) or IP Address(es) are doing the vandalism, or exactly what they are adding or deleting? See also this edit. Thanks. — Jeff G. ツ 21:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello TBHecht! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Niklas Willén - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arnold Schulman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rafael Puyana - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Allan Kozinn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Need for Birth & Death Dates

I may well be in a minority of one but I firmly believe that ALL BIOGRAPHICAL ENTRIES in Wikipedia SHOULD LIST THE BIRTH AND, if applicable, DEATH DATES, even if these dates are by necessity approximate. For example: "Mark Bittman (c.1950- ) is an American food journalist and author."

Nomination of Louis Fuzelier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Fuzelier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Fuzelier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 333-blue 08:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 333-blue (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 15:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TBHecht. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TBHecht. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

Hi! I've blanked Rome Prize and listed it at WP:CP because the initial version appears to have been copied pretty much wholesale from here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TBHecht. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda

Hello, TBHecht,

Thanks for creating Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Lewis (composer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Lewis (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lewis (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notable inclusion in lists

Hi there - I saw your recent edit to Friends School of Baltimore which included Frederick Hecht as a notable alumnus. The general guidance under WP:ALMA allows red-linked persons to be listed, but only provided they are likely to meet the standard for an article in the future, which in this case would be WP:ACADEMIC. I take it from your username and page that you are likely the same Dr. Hecht that was listed, and so may be able to help in determining that. Can you point out a few secondary sources that demonstrate you would meet the criteria for an article to be created? If so, I would love to help to create such an article, even a simple one. This would help prevent questions of notability in the future that might cause this entry to be removed from Friends School, or Hecht (surname) (Some editors are more indiscriminate about deleting redlinked names in these areas). Hope that I can help with this, and thanks for reading. Sauzer (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luspatercept, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMAD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda

Hello, TBHecht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda

Hello, TBHecht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jewish Museum Rotenburg an der Fulda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malédiction (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malédiction and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TBHecht! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean-Pierre Ohl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Malédiction

Hello, TBHecht. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malédiction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Malédiction

Hello, TBHecht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Malédiction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Jung

In 2006 you added Christian Jung to the List of geneticists, but there is nothing in his article to suggest that he is a geneticist. Is there perhaps a confusion with a different Christian Jung? Athel cb (talk) 09:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to complete this, there was indeed a confusion, and there is now an article on Christian Jung (geneticist). Athel cb (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]