User talk:TZLNCTV/Archive1

Archive of talk page, 2012-November 2016

My alternate accounts:

Ƿronglyþ
Ironyx64

My ORIGINAL account (forgot password):

Wellington10232

Welcome!

Hello, TZLNCTV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Greenfield estates, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wer900 ^talk_{essay on the definition of consensus} 00:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenfield estates

The article Greenfield estates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable place with poor context.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wer900 ^talk_{essay on the definition of consensus} 00:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Proposed deletion of Greenfield Estates

At Google maps, in the search bar type in "Greenfield Estates, Columbus, OH.

Proposed deletion of Highland Drive

The article Highland Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reason for this article to be here - we do not have articles on every single road. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^Avic _ennasis @ 12:19, 12 Sivan 5772 / 12:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turkey Run

The article Turkey Run has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reason for this article to be here - we do not have articles on every single road. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^Avic _ennasis @ 12:20, 12 Sivan 5772 / 12:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North Broadway (Columbus OH).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jamietw (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: wanting to be trouted

ok.--TZLNCTV (talk) 23:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any more trout to whack me with?--TZLNCTV (talk) 23:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Plip!

You have been minnowed for: you said to trout you!

Your article submission North Broadway (Columbus OH)

Hello TZLNCTV. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled North Broadway (Columbus OH).

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North Broadway (Columbus OH)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Virginia State Route 615 (Williamsburg and James City County) was accepted

Virginia State Route 615 (Williamsburg and James City County), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Imzadi 1979 → 21:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been accepted and then merged away into List of secondary state highways in Virginia. These secondary state routes are typically not notable, at least not enough to have separate articles. With the amount of content that was present, it was a very short stub. In the future, if the content is expanded enough, a separate article may be warranted, but for now, it has been merged. Imzadi 1979 → 21:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:St Johns County Route 210 sign.svg

A tag has been placed on File:St Johns County Route 210 sign.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Fredddie ™ 02:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of county routes in Doddridge County, West Virginia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of county routes in Doddridge County, West Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –Fredddie ™ 04:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to sign content you post on editors' & article talk pages

Like this edit on User talk:Ironyx64. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 04:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. --TZLNCTV (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umm....

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

TZLNCTV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ironyx64". The reason given for Ironyx64's block is: "Vandalism-only account: clearly not here to contribute i

Blocking administrator: Bencherlite (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You're now blocked directly for sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't spam or do crap things like Ironyx64 does. He uses a computer on my network. He likes trolling Wikipedia, and he hates reverts. I'll block his computer from Wikipedia login pages. I do think his Wikipedia: The sky isn't falling page is actually a good idea, as it is about a very common Wikipedian error: Rushing.

I do not believe you. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 08:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry? Seriously? --TZLNCTV (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And Ƿronglyþ is not a sockpuppet, it's an account I created to use to edit....

Please! I'll stop!

I will not evade my block, but please unblock me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TZLNCTV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll stop sockpuppeting and go back to editing articles for good. Please! I'd like to edit some road articles, that is my strong suit on Wikipedia. I am very sorry that I sockpuppeted and I promise that I will not do it again. TZLNCTV (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What was your intent with this edit? PhilKnight (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: To reviewing admin; please see User talk:Ƿronglyþ. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 03:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of county routes in Delaware County, Ohio

The article List of county routes in Delaware County, Ohio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

incomplete, questionable notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie ™ 01:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of county routes in Franklin County, Ohio

The article List of county routes in Franklin County, Ohio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

incomplete, questionable notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie ™ 01:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I am blocked. I know these things because I: a) Live in Columbus, Ohio b) I use Google Maps c) The new street signs being set up show the routing in fine print. --TZLNCTV (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ PhilKnight

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TZLNCTV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea why I did that other than that I was very angry, as a Microsoft Word project had gone wrong, and I took it out on Wikipedia. As I have stated before, I was very tired because I had worked on it for so long. I would NEVER do this normally, and this DEFINITELY will not happen again. I regret having done this and hope to add constructive edits to pages in the future. Thank you for your time reading this.

Decline reason:

The claim that this was a spur-of-the-moment overreaction due to tiredness and frustration would be a little more believable if the string of problematic edits didn't keep up for days and didn't include you interacting with and reverting yourself. Huon (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Huon I seriously don't know what got into me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TZLNCTV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please! I'd like to work on road articles and make constructive edits! Please! This will never happen again, I am very sorry for my actions and hope to add edits to road articles in the future.

Decline reason:

None of your unblock requests have suggested that you are capable of contributing to this encyclopedia in a constructive manner. The disingenuous nature of many of your comments (such as lying about the nature of your sockpuppets and admitting that you use Wikipedia to vent when angry) supports this theory. I think we've all wasted enough time here, so I'm revoking your talk page access. Kinu ^t/_c 17:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 03:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Kinu ^t/_c 17:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiRoadRunner

Wikipedia:WikiRoadRunner, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiRoadRunner and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiRoadRunner during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TZLNCTV/sandbox/Tom's Beans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:TZLNCTV/sandbox/Tom's Beans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 07:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking per consensus at WP:ANI

Per this ANI thread, your appeal for an unblock has been accepted, and I am unblocking your account momentarily. You stated here that you prefer this account be unblocked, instead of GhostTownsMapper. Therefore I'm unblocking this account, and leaving GhostTownsMapper (and all other sock accounts) blocked. Don't log into them; that will trigger an autoblock on this account. I think I've prevented an autoblock due to recent talk page editing by GhostTownsMapper, but please let me know if you still can't edit.

This unblock is subject to the following restrictions:

You are indefinitely restricted to one account. This one. WP:LEGIT does not apply here, you can only use this account.
Any problematic behavior that this or other accounts showed (to name one that I saw, severe overlinking to cause disruption, but if there were others, those too) will result in a re-block.

Welcome back. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]