User talk:TatesTopG

Welcome!

Hi TatesTopG! I noticed your contributions to KSI vs Swarmz and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sahaib (talk) 20:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Gasper" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gasper and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Gasper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 18:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stop moving pages

Stop moving pages, as you do not understand the criteria or standards by which to do so. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gurinder Gill, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Baksheesh. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 06:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Alcaraz Pineda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luis Alcaraz Pineda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 08:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I saw you made a page for Luis Pineda. I was planning on making one myself but never got around to making it. So thanks! 😄 I made some edits and have submitted it for review, lets hope that it gets accepted 🤞🏻

@GhaziTwaissi:, Thanks for your kind words brother and thanks for improving Draft:Luis Alcaraz Pineda. An additional thanks for working and improving on boxing-related articles. TatesTopG, 14:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toshakhana reference case. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toshakhana reference case, you may be blocked from editing. Its 2nd message for you about to removing sourced content unexplained, and disruptive edits by adding irrelevant history and news. Please edit this page in positively and always cited your content. Don't make manipulation of words and content removal, you will be blocked as Admins are watching your edits. Thanks M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333:, I have no idea what are you talking about. Can you clarify what 'disruptive edits' I made and which 'source content' did I remove this time?TatesTopG, 11:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hamid Nadimi.png

Thanks for uploading File:Hamid Nadimi.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abbottabad

Hi TatesTopG. You've added a short form reference ({{sfn}}) to Abbottabad for Watson 1908, but you haven't supplied the required cite to explain what that is referring too. Could you let me know the work, or add the required cite to the 'Sources' section. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 21:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:SheryOfficial per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luis Alcaraz Pineda

Hello, TatesTopG. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luis Alcaraz Pineda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Luis Alcaraz Pineda

Hello, TatesTopG. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luis Alcaraz Pineda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]