User talk:Terere-gb77

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Krasnodar Stadium, and I noticed that your username, "Gmp-architekten", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 13:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 14:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Terere-gb77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

username has been changed. Hi, please unblock my account, as I have fixed the two reasons for the blocking. As mentioned I my username has been changed. Concerning my entry on wikipedia I am in discussion with user Melcous about the sources and quotes that I referred to. Terere-gb77 (talk) 1:09 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Accept reason:

Username has been changed and you seem to be willing to work with other editors and edit productively, so I see no reason not to remove this block. I will, however, strongly suggest that you read the conflict of interest guidelines, and make use of the {{Paid}} template if appropriate. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. A couple of things, I didn't block you - an administrator did that. I did suggest you change your username to abide by the policy, so thanks for doing that. In terms of the article itself, due to wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, it is recommended that instead of directly editing the article, you suggest the information you think should be included on its talk page instead. In terms of a source for the information, we are looking for a reliable, secondary source so ideally something like a newspaper article rather than the club's website, are you able to find something like that? Thanks, Melcous (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]