User talk:TheArmchairSoldier
Attention
[edit]Something in which you might be interested is being discussed here. This is a blanket alert given to multiple editors, a response is not needed. DocumentError (talk) 05:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Greek ZUBRs
[edit]Hi there! The piece of news that Greece sold its four ZUBR hovercrafts to China is complete fabrication. There exists nothing on it on the Greek media, and as the ZUBR are an important (if troubled) part of rapid reaction capability they are not going to be sold off just like that anytime soon. The source itself evidently is faked, as it quotes someone with the completely unlikely name of "Kleftos Priapos", a made-up bullshit name if there ever was one. Constantine ✍ 13:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Genuine mistake. I'll reverse my edits unless you've done so already. TheArmchairSoldier (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I went ahead and made the correction. It's easy to make the mistake, I was myself surprised to see how far this piece of misinformation had spread on the web. According to some Greek sites where this is discussed, it started back in April from a Pakistani website, and has since gained a life of its own. It also shows how much Classical education has been abandoned, since no-one recognized a made-up name involving a rather well-known mythological figure. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 19:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Genuine mistake. I'll reverse my edits unless you've done so already. TheArmchairSoldier (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Just to kindly correct
[edit]SPEAR 3 is not Brimstone. SPEAR 3 is a separate missile from Brimstone and Brimstone 2 (this being SPEAR 2).
SPEAR 2 evidence:
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/mbda-reveals-brimstone-2-missile-work-for-uk-369437/
SPEAR 3:
http://www.janes360.com/images/assets/853/47853/the_UK_s_SPEAR_Cap_3_air-to-surface_weapon.pdf
So that evidence doesn't show Brimstone will be cleared for the F-35/F-35B. It shows SPEAR 3 not SPEAR 2 will be integrated on the F-35B, and again SPEAR 3 is not Brimstone.Thanks.Cantab1985 (talk) 11:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Improving the General Dynamics Wikipedia article
[edit]Hi @TheArmchairSoldier: I noticed you contribute to the General Dynamics UK Wikipedia article. On the General Dynamics Wikipedia article, there is room for improvement on a few sections. I have a COI with General Dynamics, so I will not edit the article myself but will present conceptual improvements on the talk page. To start, I rewrote the lead paragraph to clarify what the company does. Here is my proposed version. Any thoughts on this? --Chefmikesf (talk) 21:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ponderosa Zoo Logo.png
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Ponderosa Zoo Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Pitting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Littoral Response Group has a new comment
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Littoral Response Group has been accepted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for March 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Integrated Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackal (vehicle), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forsvaret.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, TheArmchairSoldier. Thank you for your work on Malloy Aeronautics. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)