User talk:TheGrandSon
Speedy deletion nomination of Apollo Sugar Clinics
[edit]Hello TheGrandSon,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Apollo Sugar Clinics for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 11:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Onel5969 you shouldn't tag the article as speedy deletion, you may put any other tag like promotional content but you shouldn't de-motivate new users by deleting the article. I am kindly requesting you to help this article improve or remove promotional content. Can you please tell the exact words, line or section that is promotional so that i could fix it.TheGrandSon (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Apollo Sugar Clinics for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apollo Sugar Clinics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo Sugar Clinics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dear DGG, as you can see the history of the page recently there were a speedy deletion tag added by user:Onel5969. And i explained my reason why the page shouldn't be deleted. Later user:Onel5969 removed that speedy deletion. I request you to kindly check all the resources and notability of the subject and then take any action. I also want a help from you to fix the issue if that breaks any of Wikipedia's guideline. Can you help me to fix the issue?TheGrandSon (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Fela Akinse for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fela Akinse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Star Mississippi 03:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.