User talk:TheMagikCow/archive3

Draft:Goods that are produced by child labor and forced labor

Thank you for your comment. I wanted to let you know that all the information in the article are from reliable sources which are listed in the reference and external links sections; and can be checked for further information on the topic discussed.--Nadya Inoubli (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

I'm just letting you know that your addition to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants has been removed. This is because you do not have the required experience. Furthermore, I am surprised at this considering the amount of advice you have already received about your editing. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I ave 500 edits and 90 days old. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you only have 194 edits to articles. This and the fact that you cannot read instructions is conclusive evidence that you should not be reviewing anything. Please neither review articles at AfC, NPP, or anywhere else. All reviewing tasks, whatever they are, require experience. Thanks.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you would nevertheless like to help maintain the quality of the encyclopedia, when you have made 200 edits to mainspace you are welcome to consider enrolling at the WP:CVUA to learn all about counter-vandalism. You would then be able to patrol pages and revert obvious vandalism. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheMagikCow:I have reverted your addition to the participants' list. As depicted here you have only 202 mainspace non-deleted edits. We require 500. Further, you have to have a significant understanding of how Wikipedia works in order to be a reviewer at AfC. I don't see any evidence of that. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence do you need for when I have 500 edits? TheMagikCow (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you click on the link in my comment above? That's what we're going to check. Wikipedia automatically records and tallies your edits. When it says you have 500 mainspace edits (look for the part of the pie chart labeled Main) then you'll be ready. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cy

hello there dont be a jerk! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.6.190 (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cy

Thank you for correcting my earlier edits, my PC has been catching multiple viruses lately, I meant no intentional vandalism. (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I do doubt this as I have never ever seen a case of thhis reported before. If you hhave evidence report it. Otherwise Please do not harass or attack other people. Also, please sign all comments with four tides (~) Thank you TheMagikCow (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cy

Where may I report such case so that I am not subject to mistaken consequences, good sir, I apologize for this inconvenience of my viruses. 67.82.6.190 (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Acyus[reply]

Big Stick Ideology

yes thank you for changing my error from Big Stick Idealogy

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
213	Brahman (cattle) (talk)	Add sources
74,427	Charlie Hebdo shooting (talk)	Add sources
144	Charolais cattle (talk)	Add sources
7	Meuse-Rhine-Issel (talk)	Add sources
20	Borough of Broxbourne (talk)	Add sources
42	Honey extraction (talk)	Add sources
59	Foot rot (talk)	Cleanup
715	Welsh Corgi (talk)	Cleanup
13	Retractor muscle of the penis (talk)	Cleanup
2,074	Saint Lucia (talk)	Expand
5,095	Morocco (talk)	Expand
3	Preta cattle (talk)	Expand
147	Dog crossbreeds (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
78	Berger Picard (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
83	Right-wing political parties (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,093	Cuba–United States relations (talk)	Merge
18	Wah (talk)	Merge
697	United Nations General Assembly (talk)	Merge
9	Cane di Oropa (talk)	Wikify
3	Cattle cycle (talk)	Wikify
19	Deori people (talk)	Wikify
1	Latvian Danish Red (talk)	Orphan
2	Estonian native cattle (talk)	Orphan
1	Lucerna (cattle) (talk)	Orphan
163	Piedmontese cattle (talk)	Stub
55	Beefmaster (talk)	Stub
4	Sardo Modicana (talk)	Stub
258	Somewhere Only We Know (film) (talk)	Stub
7	American White Park (talk)	Stub
25	Beef Shorthorn (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cluebot

Hi there. You have been a good perosn before. cluebot has given me warning for being helpful. I have changed. Thanks 80.2.172.185 (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. Please could you report the false positive and repeat the edit. Your are liable for any vandalism. Thanks!TheMagikCow (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
5	Russian Black Pied (talk)	Add sources
10	Honey bee race (talk)	Add sources
329	Languages of Singapore (talk)	Add sources
15	Droughtmaster (talk)	Add sources
66	Ayrshire cattle (talk)	Add sources
6	Tasmanian Grey (talk)	Add sources
158	Gaijin Entertainment (talk)	Cleanup
381	ARMA 2 (talk)	Cleanup
975	Borderlands (video game) (talk)	Cleanup
10	Sixty-sixth session of the United Nations General Assembly (talk)	Expand
3	Ramo Grande (talk)	Expand
388	Transistor count (talk)	Expand
206	Bearded Collie (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
38	Zerocoin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Three Rivers District Council (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
103	Continuous and progressive aspects (talk)	Merge
74	Breed registry (talk)	Merge
13	We Wanna Be With You Tour (talk)	Merge
23	University of Engineering and Technology (Taxila) (talk)	Wikify
32	Porous glass (talk)	Wikify
194	Torchlight (talk)	Wikify
4	Channel Island cattle (talk)	Orphan
5	Guido Bruck (talk)	Orphan
3	Brown Caucasian (talk)	Orphan
2	Kurgan (cattle) (talk)	Stub
7	Danish Jersey (talk)	Stub
4	The Curse of the Thirty Denarii (talk)	Stub
30	Braunvieh (talk)	Stub
2	Pezzata Rossa d'Oropa (talk)	Stub
2	Pontremolese (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi TheMagikCow. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Numismatics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volatility. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki

Hello, TheMagikCow, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Church of Google concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Church of Google, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Glading edit

Apologies MagikCow, the edit to the Laura Glading page was my first. An unhappy union member changed the original, correct text on the page using the user name of the Director of Communications for the Association of Professional Flight Attendants. The page was full of false information and opinions that run contrary to public, factual information which is easily available online. I had restored the page to the original, correct version prior to the changes. Can you please change it back? Thank you, RowleyMBirkin

Done No need to appolosise! Sorry on my behalf and the orginal version is rightly restored. Thank you very much for pointing this out and I hope that you enjoy your time on wikipedia. Just a small pointer, please sign all talk pages with four tides (~) Thank you again! TheMagikCow (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?

Hi can you confirm what is construed as not constructive. I was adding a well known point of contention that surrounds the song Shot In The Dark. I wasn't being unconstructive I was stating a fact. Apologies if I broke a rule. Regards.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Unfortunately you added a 'T' to the start of the page and most of your additions were unsourced content. Next Time please add sources to you facts and thoroughly proof read your article. Also, please sign all talk pages (with four tides(~)) and create a new section at the bottom. Thanks TheMagikCow (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC 2

Hi. I am not wholly convinced that you simply hovering over your edit count until you have reached 500 mainspace edits actually confers you with the knowlege and experience needed for reviewing. You need to have fulfilled the other requirements too. Maintenance work of this kind is not for newcomers, and joining Wikipedia with the sole desire of reviewing pages at AfC is questionable. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic Joe

Hi, can I ask your rationale for accepting this article? There doesn't appear to be any reliable third party sources (WP:RS) included (and these sources, if they exist, would have established notability). I personally would not have accepted it, but maybe you have different ideas. I also wouldn't have given it a C-class, though it's in that area between C and start that's always kind of iffy. From a fellow AfC reviewer... — kikichugirl ^speak up! 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Broken China

Like I stated when I made those edits, every section in Broken China was duplicated. Did I not make myself clear enough, or was I supposed to put an explanation in another place?

138.67.78.206 (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

we're not allowed to talk about it

it being [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Le petit fromage (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kimble

I removed the blp prod noticed off of Paul Kimble as there is a link on the side bar-those have happened to me also where I think it is unsourced but there is some ref elsewhere. Just keep that in mind. Wgolf (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the pointer!TheMagikCow (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello TheMagikCow. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at MKVToolNix. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -- Sam ^Sing! 21:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for that information presented in a clear ay that doesnt attack or make someone feel less important. I have taken that on board and will do that in the future. Thank you very much again! TheMagikCow (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your abuse

If you are a human or a bot, stop tagging new articles with a speedy and spamming talk pages one minute after the creation as of now. If you are a human it should be pretty obvious that {{free software stub}} instead of {{software stub}} was an error on my side with a good chance that I fix it in minute two after creation, and if you are a bot you might find that there are about five incoming links to MKVToolNix, so if I am a spammer you'd need to block me in addition to the speedy. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]