User talk:TheRealFolkBloos

Welcome!

Hello, TheRealFolkBloos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Black Jesus (TV series). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 07:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alexandra Daddario, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 07:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Conroy

Thanks for commenting on this article on its talk page. As a biography of a living person, there must be reliable sources or the article must be deleted. You can help to rescue the article by adding any reliable sources you can find to the article. Otherwise, I will be taking it to Articles for Deletion WP:AFD for wider discussion with editors, which you’re welcome to contribute towards. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Atkinson (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Velvet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRealFolkBloos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

None of the recent edits attributed to my account were of my doing. I forgot to log out, and somebody else must have made the changes using my profile. I will prevent this from happening in the future by logging out and clearing my cache every single time. TheRealFolkBloos (talk) 06:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)TheRealFolkBloos[reply]

Decline reason:

That means the account is now considered compromised, and can not be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.