Jump to content

User talk:The basque savior

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, The basque savior! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

September 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pope Francis. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Socialist Party (France), you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't stop saying the truth, you're norwegian you haven't read pierre péan's book The basque savior (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you re-add that information before gaining consensus for it on the article talk page, I will block you from editing. See WP:ONUS. I'm glad you've started a talk page thread, but you'll need to wait until it concludes with a consensus to include before re-adding it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I already had put a talk page before but it was removed for some reason The basque savior (talk) 08:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Rally have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Terrorism in Europe. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at National Rally, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Rally. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: you are correct about the bright-line violation. I imagine you are also aware that @FMSky: is likewise involved in the affair: cf. their identical edits to National Rally on 13 June and 10-11 June and prior:

Please note that these are *not* their only reverts in the period between 30 May and today, but just those related to one line in the infobox. Also worth noting is that The basque savior was not involved in the edit-war from 10-11 June. Best, -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 17:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Corona de Aragón fire

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hotel Corona de Aragón fire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a conspiracy theory by it's own definition, and it's also really stupid, why would the spanish government defend ETA ? The basque savior (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]