User talk:Theamazinnghelloworld

This is Theamazinnghelloworld's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alivate Group (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alivate Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alivate Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theamazinnghelloworld! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Philip Vincent has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Philip Vincent was changed by Theamazinnghelloworld (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954863 on 2018-12-10T05:07:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kavinraj Philip (December 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Velella was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No trace of notability in this peacock filled and promotional essay.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 07:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nas Daily Corporation

The article Nas Daily Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP and definitely not enough sources for a standalone page. Suggest merging into Nuseir Yassin.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PlotHelpful (talk) 08:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:John Kavinraj Philip without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove review comments from Draft articles at AfC Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:John Kavinraj Philip, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:John Kavinraj Philip. You may not remove past reviews of the draft article at AfC Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theamazinnghelloworld. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Theamazinnghelloworld. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Theamazinnghelloworld|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of promotional article

Hi. I have deleted Draft:John Kavinraj Philip because it is obvious from the wording that it has been created for promotional purposes. Please make sure you read the Wikipedia guidelines and understand how the project works before you try to create an article. Deb (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theamazinnghelloworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so sorry Wikipedia for this mess. I just finished reading the conflict of interest section and realised that there were a little parts of my article that had those stuff in it. I was totally not aware but foolishly asked for a recreation. I am the fault and I admit it now. It was so dumb of me to this but I promise you from the bottom of my part i will listen and follow instructions and do better to improve Wikipedia. Please give me a second chance. I am sorry. Galobtter, please forgive me. I just wanna contribute something to help others. I love sharing information and am willing to do it for the Wikipedia. I learned my lesson. Please give me a second chance and i will do what Wikipedia wants. Theamazinnghelloworld (talk) 10:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't state what contributions you want to make to Wikipedia(such as what articles or topic areas you want to edit) and how they would be different from your past contributions based on the conflict of interest policy. You also do not address your clear false statements about others using poor language towards you. I don't think it would be wise to unblock you until those points are addressed. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theamazinnghelloworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked as I want to contribute to Wikipedia and to all readers that use Wiki. I admit I have made mistakes and have learned my lesson. I have read all the Wikipedia guidelines and conflict of interets together with mistakes made by creators that lead to deletion. I want to edit areas such as places in my country as there are some sections of the articles which are not complete or outdated. With this I would like to request for one of the Wikipedia Admins to unblock me. Theamazinnghelloworld (talk) 10:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's a clear consensus you should remain blocked. No sooner than six months from now, you may apply under the terms of WP:SO. Note that you may need to use WP:UTRS at that time. You'll need to address the reasons that lead to this block, and to the consensus to leave the block in place. Yamla (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you would be a wonderful, wonderful member of the community here! Please tell us that you will not write about yourself or organizations and the blocking admin will very likely unblock you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the repeated recreation of John Kavinraj Philip by previous editors and Theamazinng's promotional editing on Wikidata under d:Special:Contributions/Hwhelloworld (which is very obviously also them; see also wikiquote:John Kavinraj Philip) and d:Special:Contributions/Theamazinnghelloworld, I find it highly unlikely they are anything but a long-term paid editor trying to promote John Kavinraj (and Nuseir Yassin) to the best of their ability. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is also possible that this user is a fan of Nuseir Yassin and wrote the article about himself. Paid editor? His English is not so good. Plus, what 14 yr old pays for an article? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I promise I will not write about myself or any of my related organisations. Please do consider my unblocking

Understood. Is there anyway to delete the Wikiqoute page. That page may be deleted until I get better sources to confirm those quotes. I created the Wikiquote and Wikidata ones but i suggest we leave the Wikidata and admins may delete the Wikiqoute. It would be easier for me if I had the data from Wikidata to create my article.

First, it is obvious that PHILIPJK and Hwhelloworld are also both you, right? Let's make sure you are operating only one account in the future. Wikipedia is a great place, and you would be welcome here. So, please be forthcoming and I can help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And this is important: right now, do not edit anywhere with any account except here on this talk page using this account you are using right now. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I wont edit anywhere which I dont have proper sources of. But i really want to update articles that come from my country because many are not updated and some incomplete. And I too have some new articles to submit for creation and i need to be unblocked to do so. I will be forthcoming and will follow instructions by admins. Please accept my request. But quick question, what is philipjk? Hwhelloworld is mine. But i dont have a clue what is philipjk? Thank you and God bless.

Hmmmm, PHILIPJK really, really appears to be you. Please, think back. Do you remember now? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me think.....uhh. Nope I dont recal creating any account besides helloworld. But anyway. I only control one so that is good already for Wikipedia as i hope no conflict happens. I really need to get unblocked to be alowed the usual user needs as Ive got so much to offer to Wiki. Hey Anna, one more thing. Thank you for helping me and giving me advice. I really appreciate the help. Please help me to be unblocked and i will follow and not edit unessacarily anywhere. As i said above the reasons why i feel i should be unblocked and please do consider me Anna. Thank you and God bless.

Okay. User:Galobtter is the blocking admin, and so can decide. I trust his judgement.

User:Galobtter: If unblocked, I will keep an eye on things.

Theamazinnghelloworld: We have an understanding. Of course, I we all search things here and are quite clever, like you. So, do please be a constructive member. Also, I tagged the school logo for deletion as a copyright violation. You uploaded it as your own work. Did you actually create it? (Even if you did, it appears to be a derivative of your other school logo, and so is a copyright violation.) It will likely be deleted. Please only upload images that you own the rights to. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. So I'd be willing to unblock, but I want to affirm an understanding that you will not edit related to John Kavinraj Philip (or Alivate Group etc) or Nuseir Yassin and Nas Daily Corporation but will rather focus on, as you say, "places in my country" and other articles like that. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crossing this out. It slipped my mind that you'd repeatedly lied about other editor's behaviour. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Anna for your advice. For your infomation, I studied at penang Free School and got the logo from the school administrators themselves led by Mr Omar Rashid. I also feel sad that my schools article on Wikipedia is inomplete and I cant help it anymore. I also have months of research that I want to show to the world that has to know about them. Please do help me guys. Please Sir Galobtter, I request you to unblock me as i want to keep the image of my school, community and icons of my country. Thank you and please consider me. Thank you and God bless.

Oh, dear. I just learned that you said "...He called me a f**ker this time...". That sounds like a lie. If it was true, prove it. Show us the edit. If you can, maybe you can be unblocked. (Wikipedia and lying do not go well together.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I basically forgot about that. You also have to explain why you said that other people were abusing you or calling you f**ker if you want to be unblocked. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Galobtter. It is not a joke. That guy emailed me when I released John Kavinraj Philip as an article for creation. I was shocked an when viewed his user profile it showed the administration badge (THe wiki icon with a mop). So i was not lying. Then I would like to continue on my research John Kavinraj Philip as he is a main icon in Malaysia. I will remove the parts where is seen as promotional to wiki guidelines and will continue helping wiki as much as i can. Thank you and God bless.

Nobody believes that. You have zero chance of being unblocked now. Your orgs and name will be periodically searched here and deleted. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.

Also, if you do become famous one day in a way befitting your character, (like, say, President of the USA,) a search may easily lead to these user talk pages, which could be embarrassing.

Please find another project. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thats ok. Thats ok if you guys dont belive me. If i could send a screenshot would be better but i dont want to have that on wiki commons to add here. But however, you are right about the famous part. All I am asking is a second chance. I will make all of you guys proud. You wont regret unblocking me. Trust me. I will gurantee I will make you proud. I have a passion and dont want it to waste my life. I just need a second chance Please.

No. You lied. You've blown it here. Please, turn your attention to your fledgling career. Remember the god you love. Don't lie. It's bad for you. Bad for everyone. The world has had enough of liars. Good bye and good luck in all your endeavors. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's up to the next admin that reviews this, but I think your only pathway to being unblocked is the Standard Offer plus a decision to be more forthcoming that you have been to this point. Otherwise, as Anna states you will need to do what you want to do somewhere else. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually crying right now to be honest. I promise to be forthcoming as much I can be. I am only asking for a second chance. I am 50 years old. Diagnosed with cancer. I want to at least write one article created by myself before I go. I dont want to be left out just like that. I learned my mistakes and want to make wiki better with my articles and edits. Please help me. Understand me and give me a second chance please.

I hope it's not true that you have cancer, and I hope for your well being and recovery, and I certainly don't want anyone to be crying, but your previous lies cause me and others doubt. You might want to become familiar with The Boy Who Cried Wolf. As I don't think further discussion will go anywhere, I have removed your talk page access. Another admin may restore it if they see a need to, but otherwise you will need to use WP:UTRS to request unblock if this request is declined. 331dot (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

I won't reply. For transparency, please communicate here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]