User talk:Thebigwoofa

Hi Thebigwoofa, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. --Legosock ^(talk) 00:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legosock ^(talk) 00:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Christian XXX. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You shouldn't put your personal conclusions about the subject in the article like how he manages to work so much. This is considered WP:OR. Vinh1313 (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Vinh1313 (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoying your time as an admin, mother hen? Hardly contentious, a citation of his blog would be all that's needed. It's an obvious fact. His work does come from repeat shoots with either friends, or newer girls who would be unaware of his status.

A verbatim quote from his blog. "If you were a girl in the business, and your agent called you to specifically ask you if you are comfortable working with Christian. Naturally, your first question is.....Well why do you ask? And then I am finished 98 percent of the time. This horseshit system is totally discriminatory, because I am not on the girl's no list, but Laura and A List both then personally question the girl about me specifically. Granted nothing they are saying about me is false, but let's be honest, why single me out like that? The agents don't do that to any other performers."

Clearly he's saying a girl can't have him on their 'no list' if they don't know of his past. Now if the conclusion cannot be reached that Christian would rather these girls not know of his past, the person coming to that conclusion must be a knuckle dragging cretin.

Seriously though, enjoy the whitewashing of pages.

Reread WP:OR especially the part about using primary sources such as his blog to establish your personal conclusions, "To the extent that part of an article relies on a primary source, it should: only make descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge, and make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source." Vinh1313 (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]