User talk:Thebluesharpdude

Welcome to my talk page

No Profanity
No stupid comments
No racism
I don't really give a f**k or couldn't be arsed enough to answer such comments with apathy.
And sign four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Thank You

--My life is the computer (talk) 21:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC) hi --My life is the computer (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC) hi.[reply]

Whats up i need help on wikipedia. --My life is the computer (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Thebluesharpdude/J0HNNY

User:Thebluesharpdude/J0HNNY, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thebluesharpdude/J0HNNY and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Thebluesharpdude/J0HNNY during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pitchfork

Well, the article looks decent and more-or-less encyclopedic so I'd just say to be patient. If they're on tour now, try and find "non-trivial coverage in a reliable source". In the US, I think you could get by if it was a good-sized regional tour instead of the whole country (e.g. most of the East Coast). Finding non-trivial coverage in a reliable source will be the tricky part. Just keep checking the internet for coverage (remember: stuff like blogs don't count) and I'm sure eventually there'll be enough for them to pass WP:MUSIC. Precious Roy (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, same difference. Just keep an eye for any coverage. Precious Roy (talk) 00:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Smartalex.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smartalex.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Chavez

It was deleted because it was a re-creation of J0HNNY, which was deleted via AfD. It appears that someone then may have re-created it as an attack article; I don't know because I can't see the deleted article but that's my guess (unless, as Yamla suggested, the deleting admin just hit the wrong button). Precious Roy (talk) 12:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead singer

Did you discuss the move of the entire content of List of lead singers anywhere? I'm not sure people necessarily want the entire list of lead singers when looking for this article. GlassCobra 16:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guitar Legends

You set my game Guitar Legends up for speedy deletion. Listen, I took classes on how to create video games and Guitar Legends is real. It was short because I'm not quite finished with it yet. I'm still making the 3-d Models and Backgrounds. So once I'm finished it will be a lot bigger. JakeJake 8:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox

I saw the message you sent me and I really don't know what a sandbox is. JakeJake 9:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

DARI

The article DARI has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heartstopsbeatinggreen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Heartstopsbeatinggreen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Emotronic

I have nominated Emotronic, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotronic (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Azazyel (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Chavez

A tag has been placed on John Chavez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Epbr123 (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keytarist

Per your apparent intent here, and per consensus at the AfD, I have closed the deletion debate on this article as Keep. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 02:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Thebluesharpdude

User:Thebluesharpdude, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thebluesharpdude and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Thebluesharpdude during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 04:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Duckandcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Duckandcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Duckandcoveralternate.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Duckandcoveralternate.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pacman_Jones#Requested_move_to_Adam_Jones_.28football.29_revisited

I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gothatfarsingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gothatfarsingle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alandsurg.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alandsurg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamingriotgirlim.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flamingriotgirlim.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robomodo

A tag has been placed on Robomodo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Robomodo-Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Robomodo-Logo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nigga moment

The article Nigga moment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable phrase, no reliable source definition. Target redirect page has no occurrence of phrase.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 00:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Nigga moment

AfD nomination of Acoustic music

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Acoustic music. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic music. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Operation MySpace

The article Operation MySpace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (media) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smartalex.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smartalex.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smartalex1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smartalex1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"High Voltage(Linkin Park Song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect High Voltage(Linkin Park Song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § High Voltage(Linkin Park Song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"High Voltage (Linkin Park Song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect High Voltage (Linkin Park Song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § High Voltage (Linkin Park Song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]