User talk:Thedeadpet

November 2022

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kimberly Dos Ramos without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--GeogieTax (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get this. Why it was difficult do distinguish from vandalism? Thedeadpet (talk) 03:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beira's Place, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 21:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are wondering why I started this off at a level 3 warning, which would normally be a little aggressive for a first offence, it is because it was not a first offence. Back in March, you made this disruptive edit, which was promptly reverted. Today you also made this deliberate attempt to obfuscate accurate article content. In fact, when you first started editing, back in July 2021, your very first actions were to make two mildly, but clearly intentionally, disruptive edits to articles related to transgender people. If you want continue to edit Wikipedia you are going to have to leave your personal grudges out of your editing. DanielRigal (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thedeadpet! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Trans woman. DanielRigal (talk) 22:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as you have been warned about misusing the minor edits option to make substantive edits, any future abuse of the minor edits option will be assumed to be deliberate. DanielRigal (talk) 22:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:DanielRigal has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seddon ^talk 23:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fun fact

The albums were first released by Sony (example). Subsequent releases are not "the truth". (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even have sources for such claims? Or are you vandalizing once again like the beautiful warns that decorate your talk page? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the article of Sony Music here on Wikipedia. The source you are sharing with me does NOT say Sony Music Colombia, because they are a local subdivision. There are a lot of sources, including the original LPs and CDs themselves that state that the label is Columbia. Thedeadpet (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Being a subdivision of a major record label doesn't make the parent label the label. I have Pies Descalzos. Columbia is never mentioned. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pies Descalzos, you may be blocked from editing. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The_Storm_Before_the_Calm#Euro_label

Hi @Thedeadpet. There's a discussion on the talk page about label in the infobox of The Storm Before the Calm. Your comments would be appreciated. Regards. 113.210.105.11 (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]