User talk:Theoallen1
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Theoallen1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 16:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Demagogue
[edit]Hi, Theoallen1. I'm sorry to see that your first edit on Wikipedia got reverted within minutes. Clearly you put a lot of honest, diligent work into it, but the reversion was indeed appropriate. This can be very discouraging to a new editor! Wikipedia's strict policy on maintaining a neutral point of view can be frustrating at first, but it's one of the main reasons for Wikipedia's success. I just posted something on the talk page for Demagogue that you might find useful. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- And for that matter, Theoallen1, please have a look at WP:3RR. You're on your way to a policy violation and if you keep it up, you'll get blocked and the article will remain the way it is. Explaining yourself in your edit summaries where you revert others is not enough. The thing to do now is discuss your concerns on the article's talk page. As you can see, BenKovitz has already begun this discussion so all you need to do is reply. Once the discussion is settled, the article can be edited accordingly. RunnyAmiga (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Theoallen1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Theoallen1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC) |
Untitled section
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/50px-Information.svg.png)
- Violations of the Biographies of living people policy
- Violations of the Neutrality policy
- Violations of the No Original Research policy
- Information that does not rely on Reliable sources
Please note that I don't like it is NOT a valid reason for removing information from Wikipedia.
You may cite your reasons in the edit summary, or in the article's talk page if you need more room than the edit summary affords.
Thanks again,
Zlassiter (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)*Moved from Userpage. @Zlassiter: Please place your comments on talk pages, not user pages. Thank you. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:56, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Peacedove.svg/60px-Peacedove.svg.png)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding editing without consensus going on, section blanking. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016".The discussion is about the topic List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Zlassiter (talk) 05:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Theoallen1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
In this case the one-revert rule applies: please read the {{American politics AE}} warning on the talk page of the article. If you revert again you will be immediately blocked. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Theoallen1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)