User talk:Tigerikkada
Welcome!
[edit]
|
RonBot (talk) 21:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit] Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Don't add wrong dob and unsual edits to Nabha Natesh. TheRedBox (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Quickly familiarise yourself with WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources
[edit]Re: this and this, boxofficeindia.co.in has never been established as a reliable source per Wikipedia standards. Please stop submitting it, and other lesser sources. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of sites that are and are not generally considered reliable in the context of Indian entertainment. We don't care what blogs and other random websites think. We only care what reliable mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say. See also WP:RS. Any other poor sources submitted will be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to K.G.F: Chapter 1. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] I'm unclear on what you mean by "highly positive reviews" since that is a hyperbolic declaration. Do you mean that one reviewer shat himself because the film was so insanely great, or that 90% of reviewers thought the film was "good"? This inherent confusion from superlative language is part of the reason we are sure to write in neutral language. Also, Timesnownews is not a reliable source. You've submitted a couple of poor references so far, so I will again point you to WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources so you can recalibrate your editing instincts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Link doesn't resolve
[edit]Hi there, FYI, your link here doesn't resolve, so your change has been reverted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sonia Gandhi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
_poster.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
_poster.jpg){kind=link}
January 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of highest-grossing Indian films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Poor references
[edit]Please don't use poor references like xappie.com as you did here. See our reliable sourcing guidelines and WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Diff: [3] You are not the arbiter of truth at Wikipedia. When different reliable sources have different opinions about a film's financial performance, you do not get to choose the one that you believe. We present the content in the form of a range. Your change is indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Masood Azhar. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. regentspark (comment) 15:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Proper typography
[edit]Hi there, re: this edit, any change that requires another user to clean up is not really helpful. We require that editors be able to use standard English spelling, grammar, typography and proper Wikipedia formatting. In this instance, Kgf chapter 1 wouldn't be consistent with that because you did not properly capitalise a proper noun, (a film title,) you didn't use proper punctuation consistent with the article's title, and you didn't italicise the film title. ''K.G.F: Chapter 1'' would be correct and I have fixed it for you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K.G.F: Chapter 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Using primary sources
[edit]Hi, I have reverted this edit, because it was a WP:PRIMARY source. We do not add box office figures claimed by the producers themselves. That source was re-reporting the producer's claim ("last week ..."). Continental Rift (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Important Notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 18:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Love Jihad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srinidhi Shetty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Resubmitting problems
[edit]Hi there, when someone points out that content you added is problematic for some reason, the solution isn't to resubmit it, the solution is to fix it, which I have done for you here. The addition of "and acted in over 50 films" makes the sentence very clunky, because we don't just tack on additional content to an already-long sentence, especially when it contains multiple "and"s. We have to structure it properly or create a new sentence. "The car is orange and has stripes and is fast" is sloppy and amateurish. "The orange, striped car is fast" or "the car with the orange stripes is fast" are much better.
- Anushka is one of the highest paid actresses in India and is popularly referred as Lady Superstar of South Indian cinema and acted in over 50 films.
vs:
- Anushka, who has appeared in over 50 films, is one of the highest-paid actresses in India and is popularly referred as Lady Superstar of South Indian cinema.
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"National crush"
[edit]Re: this, instead of just blindly swallowing everything that the Indian media feeds you, you might help yourself by asking questions and researching things a little more clearly. At Talk:Rashmika Mandanna I have detailed why this "National Crush of India" thing is utter garbage produced by idiot journalists, in case you actually want to educate yourself. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Silent reversions
[edit]Silent reversions like these are not helpful to anybody. This is a community project, and you need to be willing to communicate. If you are not willing to communicate, then you shouldn't be reverting anything. This is considered disruptive behaviour, so if you feel strongly about the reversions you made, you need to participate in the talk page discussion that the other editor opened. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Divya Spandana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Divya Spandana, you may be blocked from editing. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nikki Galrani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change the birth date that is said by the subject herself. Also TOI profiles are not considered reliable as per WP:ICTF. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
What was the point?
[edit]What was the point of this edit where you removed a community-preferred wikified template and replaced it with less-preferred HTML markup? If you don't know what purpose a template serves, or why it is being used, ask someone, say, at the Help Desk, but don't just delete templates if you don't know what you're doing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited N. T. Rama Rao Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tollywood.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nabha Natesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
March 2022
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Kashmir Files, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Venkat TL (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sarkaru Vaari Paata, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
You must add a independent source (ie not by producer) which says that the was
financial hit" Diff: [4] Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at File:K.G.F logo.jpg, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 04:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. See Special:Diff/1092791557 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Please don't use foul language. Diff: [5] Ab207 (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate images, as you did at File:Karthikeya 2 Poster.jpeg, you may be blocked from editing. Images used only for vandalism may be added to the bad image list to prevent them from being displayed. SP013 (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Must write summary of your edit
[edit]I am seeing you are doing good work on wiki. But you are not giving summary of your edit after editing a particular article. Please provide a summary of your edit after editing any article as much as possible; it will help other editors to know what edits have you done. Ps103ankit (talk) 10:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)