User talk:Tkurosa1

Welcome!

Hello, Tkurosa1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Tkurosa1/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tkurosa1/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Tkurosa1/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SwisterTwister talk 17:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SwisterTwister talk 17:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on the above, advertising of any kind is never tolerated here and bypassing actual review or independent of whether or not it can be accepted, is no better. One of the important things here is to disclose any connection you may have, and this can apply as an employee or simply a business partner (refusal to comply when valid can lead to legal consequences, as by WP:Paid). The only solution, at best, is to appropriately allow the page to be examined and ask for such review, before automatically moving. SwisterTwister talk 22:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tkurosa1. Wikipedia may be many things, but one thing is is definitely not intented to be is a vehicle for promotion. If you are connected in anyway to the company, I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Although Wikipedia does not expressly prohibit COI editing, it is something which is highly discouraged because it can lead to more serious problems. "Nobleparma" has been moved back to the draft namespace because their are some strong concerns about it's sutiability as a stand-alone article. Even if you are connected to the company, you can still continue working on the draft and trying to improve it. Perhaps you should take a look at Wikipedia:Your first article, Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Guidelines on ways to possibly do that. You can even ask for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology for ideas. When you feel the draft is ready to be upgraded to article status, please submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation by clicking on the blue "Submit your draft for review!" button I added to the page. An experienced AfC reviewer will then review the submission and provide comments on things that still need to be improved. It's hard to write an article in accordance with all of Wikipedia's policy and guidelines, so don't be discouraged if your draft is rejected. Just make the suggested improvements and re-submit. You repeat this process as long as it takes as long as you keep improving the draft and addressing any issues pointed out by the AfC reviewers.

The other option is not as productive and may end badly for you. If you continue to try and force this draft into the encyclopedia by moving it yourself, especially in its current state, you're not going to accomplish your goal and are only going to lead to an administrator being asked to get involved to assess your actions and take appropriate action to prevent any further disruption. If an adminstrator feels that the only way to accomplish this is to block you account, they will. Moreover, if an administrator feels you are not complying with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, they will also block your account. I am not trying to discourage your from contributing to the encyclopedia, I just want to make sure you understand that you need to be editing for the right reasons because you will find yourself having problems doing so if you're not. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nobelpharma Co., Ltd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nobelpharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nobelpharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — fortunavelut luna 05:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]