User talk:Toa Nidhiki05 (Work)

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur) (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Toa Nidhiki05 (Work)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SafariScribe - I'm an experienced editor, so I'll just ask you directly here - can you provide more detail on why the article was rejected? I made substantial changes from a previous version I wasn't involved with, which I believe added a slew of strongly reliable sources that discuss Azhar or his work in great detail. Could you provide a bit more guidance on what exactly is missing? Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 15:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am opting in for a second review. I see a flawed article about his company and book that lacks independence. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it! Please let me know some specifics. I really do think he's notable, which is why I chose to work on this, so if there are any areas that need improvement I'd be more than happy to do more research and find more sources to make it happen. A challenge is indeed that much of the sources also refer to his book or company, but I think on the whole the person himself is notable. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur) has been accepted[edit]

Azeem Azhar (entrepreneur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craig Angelos (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Craig Angelos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SafariScribe, just checking about this one. I'd strongly encourage taking another look, especially at the sources - here's the three best ones:

Palm Beach Post - An entire article about Angelos's tenure at FAU, and his firing. This source is both independent of FAU, and covers the article subject and his career in detail.
Palm Beach Post 2 - An additional article about his firing and tenure at FAU.
Honolulu Star Advertiser - Article about Angelos's hiring at Honolulu, independent of the subject.

These are three major newspapers covering Angelos in great detail. I think this is sufficient to establish notability - specifically, three independent reliable sources providing significant, non-trivial coverage. There are several other news articles in the article as well covering Angelos in detail, and if more are needed I'd be happy to look for them. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Toa Nidhiki05 (Work), I was having double mind on whether to accept or decline this draft, but chose the latter since I will discuss it a bit with you. I am coming back to understand the role (one of the good things of doing this is to avoid AFD by speedy tagging users). Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good - I understand the reluctance, especially when dealing with a disclosed editor, and appreciate your willingness to discuss! rToa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]