User talk:Tomato3991

Welcome!

Hello, Tomato3991, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Image:Priory logo.gif

Um. You are free to remove warnings from your page, but if you don't take care of the issues with the images, it will be deleted. On a similar note, the article on Priory Community School was almost a pure copyright violation; I have removed most of the text. Please feel free to recreate with substantially altered wording. Thanks, riana_dzasta 16:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

for now either you or i can delete the image, you choose.----tomato3991----

Neither of us can delete the image - we're not administrators. If you provide the proper tagging info, it won't be deleted. riana_dzasta 17:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i see what you mean Tomato3991 11:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)tomTomato3991 11:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Priory School

I don't want to delete it, I'm questioning the notability. Also, you don't own this article, it is not yours and having a list of teachers is just plain absurd. Also, I'm not even using my admin abilites, I recommend you stop badgering me. Yanksox 18:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Priory Community School

An editor has nominated the article Priory Community School for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priory Community School. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Priory Community School during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic

No i dont own this article, but neither do you. I merely created it to inform people of the school and who teaches there and what happens, by no mean stretch of imagination is having a list of the subjects and the heads of those subjects absurd, because it is a section i was going to build on and make stronger. If you want the article to be deleted, fine but the world doesnt revolve around you.Thomas Murlis 10:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Both logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Both logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Priory Community School, you will be blocked from editing. TimTay (talk) 13:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

in reference to above, sorry, i wont do any more- tomato3991

Notability of Flint-white, purple

A tag has been placed on Flint-white, purple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Psychology of women

A tag has been placed on Psychology of women requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. God Emperor (talk) 11:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4chan

You can't just blank a page. You've been reported for vandalism. --Koala 10:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)