User talk:Tomwaddington

Welcome!

Hello, Tomwaddington, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! V. Joe 02:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Good article needs work

After some reference checking, it appears that Jo Good made her first appearance in film in 1978, when, according to the age you gave of 26, she was -2. --John Nagle 20:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we have Jo Good vs JoAnne Good figured out now, even though they both do breakfast radio shows. --John Nagle 20:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Lightbody

Hi, you had uploaded this image a while back. But you havent specified where from you got it, the source, and permission. If you see this message, please fix it. Suede67 (talk) 22:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cut Out + Keep (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cut Out + Keep and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 23:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JMHamo (talk) 23:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cut Out + Keep (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

There continues to be no evidence for notability -- essentially everything here is a press release. 'Please do not resubmit unless you have much better references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cut Out + Keep and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cut Out + Keep has been accepted

Cut Out + Keep, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I approved your article because I don't think it's obviously non-notable. However, it would benefit from substantial revision. I would recommend removing the coverage section, and instead expand and cite a section about the website itself, using the articles cited in the coverage section as references. Good luck, Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]