User talk:Toya

Welcome!

Hello, Toya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 16:14, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

Re: ==

George W. Bush, not Andrew Haas, is President of the United States. Sango 123

You mean this edit? I'd say that was either vandalism or a test since Andrew Haas and David Hiester don't even have their own articles. Thanks for removing it from List of Presidents of the United States. Regards, Sango 123 15:54, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi. Can I suggest that you provide more information in your edit summaries? Adding the same text (in another language), regardless of the edit, provides no information to anyone reviewing the change. Please consider providing valid edit summaries. - Tεx τ urε 16:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What he said. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 16:41, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

אני המשתמש אריאול

Hi אריאול. I think you misunderstand the purpose of the edit summary (unless I'm missing something). Please review the edit summary guidelines. Thanks. El_C 11:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. Please start using English in your edit summaries, as writing in Hebrew does most of us no good. John Barleycorn 05:05, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

אריאול/Toya, you need to tread lightly. El_C 09:37, 30 July 2005 (UTC) ,בברכה[reply]

British Commonwealth Occupation Force

I know there were non-Americans in Japan in 1945, even before the official surrender was signed on USS Missouri. But February 21, 1946 is when the official British Commonwealth Occupation Force arrived. Grant65 (Talk) 13:18, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Fire balloons on WWII Theater Template

Fire balloons were a weapon, not a theater of war.--Jpbrenna 22:33, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

unhelpful edits

Please consider creating articles rather than just creating links to non-existant articles. Once the articles exists, then you can create links to them. Also, I would definitely suggest using edit summaries. Otherwise other editors will say bad things about you behind your back or leave tacks in your chair when you aren't looking. Kaldari 20:26, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

is this for real

[1], it amused me anyhow! Leonig Mig 10:28, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is real! see here. Toya 11:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Public response 9/11

Hi, Toya. I see the new page you've created. Two points:

The initial statement seems a bit subjective. I realize the topic is a bit subjective but new articles undergo a lot of scrutiny, and you should be prepared to receive comments about the page.

Another tip: I think your article would be much better served, and much more positively recieved, if you have something in it right from the beginning. One trick I use is, I wrote two very solid paragraphs, with a lot of research and detail, before I start a serious new article. Even have a link or two ready. This way people know you have done some actual work in advance, and are likely to show well-written results in little time.

What you have now is a stub, and it is going to come under attack -- fairly or not -- because there isn't really anything there.

Hope this will be of some value to you, and let me know if I can help.

klenk 07:01, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

Hi, please remember to briefly summarize your edits. The summary text will appear on the recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. Thanks and happy edits! ←Humus sapiens ←ну? 19:39, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Please don't add blank articles to templates. Your changes are well-meaning, but they don't help navigate to related articles, which is the point of templates. --Goodoldpolonius2 18:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Al Aqsa

Yes the Hebrew letter צ is pronounced "ts" by most Israelis, but since Aqsa is an Arabic word, and צ is similar to the Arabic ص, most Hebrew speakers I've heard pronounce it as Aqsa with a hard "s". Anyway I changed it back. Ramallite ^(talk) 17:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Academic transliterations of Hebrew

Please leave the academic transliterations of Hebrew names intact—they are academic conventional spellings, not alternate spellings (which can be listed as "or Other Name", etc.). For Standard Hebrew in detailed academic contexts, ḥ is used for ח in all cases, and ḫ is used for soft כ in all cases. These are typical across Semitic linguistics studies. We do not use kh in this way. - Gilgamesh 23:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

west bank barrier

Thanks for editing this article. Please stick around . Zeq 19:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sept 11 detentions

Nice work on the detentions article. Kaldari 05:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hi, thanks for all your contributions. I just wanted to ask you to please use the edit summary box at the bottom of a page before you submit a change. See Wikipedia:Edit summary for more information. Edit summaries are extremely helpful to help catch vandals and help RC patrols distinguish legitament entries (like yours), from the bad entries that so often need to be reverted. Thanks. -- Malo 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toya.

Thanks again for your contributions. Can I suggest that if you are going to create a page about the Commonwealth countries in WWII then it should be called Military history of the Commonwealth of Nations during World War II, although it should probably contain little except links to the individual military history articles for each country. If you are not intending to create such a page it is probably better to leave a link to an existing page (Commonwealth of Nations) rather than a non-existant page in World War II. DJ Clayworth 16:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Emergency (Ireland, 1939 - 1945)

Thanks for moving your edit to this more detailed article. But you still haven't provided any sources for your statements. If you can do so, feel free to revert my edit of your addition. --137.108.145.10 17:10, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Official titles

Hi - "Palestinian National Authority" (PNA) is the complete official title, whereas "Palestinian Authority" (PA) is shorter but used commonly. Official documents are not consistent, many applications and certificates have PNA on them, but others (including the Palestinian passport and (תעודת זהות) only have PA. As you can tell, it is not very professional. However, to answer your question, PNA is the official correct title, and in the encyclopedia should be used instead of PA. Ramallite ^(talk) 16:35, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think "filastiniyah" sounds more proper than "falastiniyah" - to be honest the "fat'ha" or "kasra" (nequda) on the letter ف is something we learned in elementary school (and it's different depending on where a word is in the sentence - Arabic I'raab) and I don't remember the grammar rules right now, people say it both ways. But I think the proper pronunciation for a word that is after "tahrir" is with a kasra - "filastiniyah" . Ramallite ^(talk) 10:35, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The section in the article 1948 Arab-Israeli War

Dear Toya, This section just needs to be re-written in good English and a source or sources cited and then it will be fine. --Ian Pitchford ^{(t) | (c) | (bias)} 11:54, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Intifada

In "intifada", the first "a" is longer than the second "a", so when writing transliterations it makes sense to say "intifaadat" or "intifādat" to make it more clear. Question for you: in Oslo Accords you wrote "was nicknamed the "refusal organizations"" - who calls them "refusal organizations"? We call them "mu'aradah" which simply means "the opposition". I was just wondering.... Ramallite ^(talk) 13:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of Tanakh

Hi Toya: Please see and vote at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 12#Category:Hebrew Bible at [2] where it is beeing suggested that the word "Tanakh" is "not neutral", and I am trying to explain to them that it is in keeping with NPOV to convey the way Judaism uses certain terms to describe the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh. Thanks. IZAK 16:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

Merge the info of the "conflict" article to another relevant article. Zeq 19:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ashamed?

I am not sure I understand. If we need to say West Bank for a specific reason, yes we say "the West Bank". But we refer to it as Palestine otherwise. For example; Where are you from? I am from Palestine. Where is Ramallah? North of Jerusalem in the West Bank in Palestine. It's like if you live in גוש דן, you still say 'here in Israel' or 'I am from Israel' or 'I am traveling to Israel'. Where exactly in Israel? the גוש דן region. It doesn't mean that the Negev is not part of Israel also. So it is very much dependent on context, but it is normal to say 'Palestine' unless there is a special reason that you need to identify it specifically. Ramallite ^(talk) 04:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

El or Al (not the airline)

In Arabic it is spelled 'aleph lam', so I guess 'Al' is more proper than 'El'. Also, the Arabic letter 'ص' in "Aqsa" is pronounced a hard "S", the same as the way Sephardim (or Yehudim Mizrachim) pronouce 'צ'. Ashkenazim usually pronounce it 'TS'. But in Arabic this letter is always a heavy "S" and never "TS". Ramallite ^(talk) 06:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi. The only problem there is that the article was up for deletion previously and many people had concerns. When you merged it into the Islam and Judaism article, it can cause concern. So it would be nice if you could discuss that on the talk page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 15:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Settlement versus Community

Thank you for explaining your choice of the word settlement. However, within the context of Palestinian attacks on Israel, the word “settlement” takes on a decidedly particular definition (i.e. Israeli population centers within the so-called "occupied territories"), and I would much rather there be no confusion as to what Palestinians are attacking. You'll surely agree with me that there is much less support for Palestinian bombardment of Israeli civilians than there is for Palestinian aggression toward the targets more commonly referred to as "settlements."

Acting Prime Minister

Actually, in English the term is "Acting Prime Minister" as per all media reports. Homey 14:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HaPanterim HaSHkhorim

You have not provided any sources in HaPanterim HaSHkhorim. Could you cite some useful references, please?

Also, is there any particular reason why you user uppercase SH for a shin? I'm wondering if that is not problematic under the naming conventions. JFW | T@lk 22:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know shin is one letter in the Hebrew alphabet, but the "sh" in English is a diphtong and there should be no need to transliterate the shin to SH. Have you seen this convention in any other articles? JFW | T@lk 09:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article was transferred to the existing page Israeli Black Panthers. I added some references with external links but didn't change much of the text. --Pylambert 17:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Israel = Yisrael?

Shalom! I was wondering if there was any particular reason for your move of Israel Maimon to Yisrael Maimon. Is it one of those Hebrew language things? Thanks. - 20:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)The Great Gavini ^שיחה

Gettysburg Address

Hi, I appreciate your contributions to this article, but many of your changes have not improved the English syntax or sentence structure. Maybe you could consider doing fewer of this type of edits, or run these changes by someone else? I'd certainly welcome your input in improving the factual parts of the article and in many other areas. Cheers, Kaisershatner 02:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AleYarok.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AleYarok.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tafnit.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tafnit.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

תרגום

ראיתי שאתה מרבה לתרגם ערכים מעברית לאנגלית. האם אתה יכול לתרגם את הערך הבא, הוא גם מופיע בגרמנית.

[3] --Haham hanuka 17:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Hitler's contacts with Jewish people

Do you have a reference for this? --Electric Eye (talk) 11:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AleYarok.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AleYarok.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Bird flu around the world

Template:Bird flu around the world has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Rocket000 09:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:JFK assassination

A tag has been placed on Template:JFK assassination requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kol TSion HaLokhemet

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kol TSion HaLokhemet. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kol TSion HaLokhemet. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AleYarok.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AleYarok.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]