User talk:TradingSpousesWelsch

Welcome!

Hello, TradingSpousesWelsch!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 02:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! TradingSpousesWelsch (talk) 02:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amos Pewter has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amos Pewter. Thanks! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amos Pewter (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please ensure you declare any conflict of interest on your user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amos Pewter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to "declare any conflict of interest" on my user page and I don't appreciate being falsely accused of something like that, either. If you have any constructive criticism for how to actually improve my article draft, I will gladly accept it. FYI I did try to find neutral coverage of the subject matter, and my sources do include unbiased third parties with no association to the topic I'm writing about. The only times I used sources directly linked to the topic was for basic facts about the topic's corporate operations. All the other sources are third party reputable news agencies, community newsletters and magazines. TradingSpousesWelsch (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TradingSpousesWelsch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deb (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amos Pewter (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amos Pewter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marcia Gay Harden breasts

Just so you know, the previous spelling "bare" her breasts was correct. It has nothing to do with being a verb. Bare and bear are two different words. Bear as a verb means to carry. Bare as a verb is to uncover, which is what she was doing. Blainster (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then... TradingSpousesWelsch (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amos Pewter

Hello, TradingSpousesWelsch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amos Pewter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amos Pewter

Hello, TradingSpousesWelsch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Amos Pewter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Mangler (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronald Mlozdik (Canadian actor).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronald Mlozdik (Canadian actor).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]