User talk:Trasz

Welcome!

Hello, Trasz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay (talk) 13:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Machine Emulator

A tag has been placed on The Machine Emulator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 19:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BSD code in Microsoft products

hmm - I found a source for it, and you deleted the mention, because you prefer it not mentioned. fits with your edits, which are POV-based. Tedickey (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is a correct way of replying, I hope it is.

Anyway - If you count the "code" in the C headers, then the BSD code is used _everywhere_, including Mars Rover. Personally, I don't think we should mention anything but _serious_ usage - JunOS, for example, is based on FreeBSD, and Darwin gets about half of its kernel from FreeBSD, not counting device drivers. Windows, on the other hand, uses BSD code mostly in the ftp.exe, which is largely insignificant. In particular, the TCP/IP stack in Windows does not include BSD code.

Your revert of the possibility of an ABI breakage in FreeBSD

You reverted the inserted of "usually" in "in FreeBSD, kernel module compiled on FreeBSD 6.0 will work without recompilation on any other FreeBSD 6.x version, e.g. 6.4." A reference to a member of the FreeBSD release engineering team was given that contains the statement "occasionally the fix for a bug can not be implemented without ABI breakage, and it is decided that the fix warrants the impact of the ABI breakage." You give an explanation for your revert, but no source for your claim. Would you care to provide a source by answering the question on the talk page of Loadable kernel module? Moreover, your explanation only covers the change that the source refers to, but not the general statement contained therein. Thus, "usually" may be an overstatement, but not really wrong. 85.177.242.67 (talk) 15:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ZFS/GPL/patents

I left a reply on my talk page... Regards. Mkcmkc (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptive spinlocks

Do you have a source for most OSs using these? The source currently in the article describes this as a specific innovation to Solaris, so doesn't support the text as it now stands. JulesH (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPS on PTS

What do you mean by FPS in the PTS article? Do you mean first-person shooters? If so, link to that to make it clear. -- Frap (talk) 17:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

In case you don't already know I thought I would let you know that IP 87.64.120.55 has reported you to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism in this edit. The report has been rejected by another administrator, and if it hadn't been then I would have rejected it, as your editing is clearly not vandalism, but I just thought you might like to know. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Btw, would it be possible to protect this page, as it is now? Reverting that change is getting annoying.Trasz (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have semi-protected the article. We will have to see how much that helps. Let me know if the problem continues. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of computer system emulators, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TME and Nonpareil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OSv

The slides are not WP:INDEPENDENT. I would even call them a press release. They should not function as sources by themselves. Keφr 18:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FreeBSD, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages GCC and GELI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:FBSDF15-years.svg

Thank you for uploading File:FBSDF15-years.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"extreme right wing" labeling

Trash, please stop labeling people "right wing", "extreme right wing" etc. and settle on conservative worldview. Also your "undo" count is quite high. So consider yourselves warned. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.20.173 (talk) 05:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trasz, I understand that one may have its own worldview (as you obviously have one on the left side) but please refrain from labeling people "extreme right wing","anti-semite" etc. Try to stay bias free while editing. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.20.173 (talk) 06:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:FBSDF15-years.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:FBSDF15-years.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced information

Hi Trasz, You seem to be removing sourced information from the "Smolensk Crash" article. Just to give you heads up, if you continue I will report you. BestGizzyCatBella (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding new comments

Please make sure you add new comments in Talk pages always at the bottom, even if they address previous posts further up, otherwise it becomes extremely hard to spot them (unless someone opens the history and looks at the diffs, which readers generally won't bother to do) and it also creates confusion about who is referring to what. See Wikipedia's quidelines on Talk pages: "the latest comment in a thread should be posted in chronological order and not placed above earlier comments". Thanks. --Deeday-UK (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trasz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Your recent editing history at List of products based on FreeBSD shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Dane ^talk 18:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FBSDF15-years.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FBSDF15-years.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trasz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ziemkiewicz

Hej. Mógłbyś przestać niszczyć ten artykuł? Tashi _{Talk to me} 10:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soft microprocessor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MIPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trasz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rafał A. Ziemkiewicz

Could you join please? [1] AvertSec (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Robert McClenon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Rafał A. Ziemkiewicz that didn't seem very civil, ~~so it has been removed~~, but cannot be removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Using the word 'vandalism' in an edit summary. See Uncivil Edit Summaries. The allegation of vandalism is a personal attack. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GizzyCatBella. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. You're disrupting my enjoyment of editing and causing me significant distress. Please end following me from place to place on Wikipedia and stop reverting my edits. GizzyCatBella🍁 11:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making ideologically motivated changes that need to be reverted then :-) Trasz (talk) 12:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 - Introduction of unsourced information into BLP's

Trash, look, you WP:HOUNDING me around [2] is one thing that I can live with, but you need to stop introducing repeatedly unsourced information into articles of the BLP's as you did here [3], [4] and here [5],[6], [7] and here [8], [9], [10] Do you have sources to back up your claims that these people are mostly recognized for what you wrote? Please self-revert or provide solid sources for the above claims. - GizzyCatBella🍁 15:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not hounding you. It’s just that you have the habit to delete things you disagree with, and those cases need to be fixed.

If something is unsourced, then it needs sources, not deletion. Trasz (talk) 07:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Attacking other editors

Please stop referring to other editors’ good faithed edits as “vandalism”, when they’re clearly not. You’ve been warned before, you are being warned now and any further continuance of such behavior will be taken as an intentional WP:NPA personal attack. Volunteer Marek 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been already explained to you that your behaviour - ignoring consensus, forcing POV, and calling other editors sockpuppets - is not "good faithed edits", it's vandalism. Trasz (talk) 09:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history at Black Madonna of Częstochowa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Last warning

For the last time, please stop insulting people in your edit summaries and talk page comments [11]. I’m trying to be as polite as possible under the circumstances but you’re really pushing this. Volunteer Marek 17:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's you who insults people, I'm just returning the favor. And believe me, I'm doing my best at being polite in lieu of your vandalism. Trasz (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Trasz

If you trail, follow my edit and revert me one more time (as you just did yet AGAIN here [12]) I’ll reach to our overworked admin team this time. So you know, last warning my friend. - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfounded accusations, as usual. Trasz (talk) 09:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That will be judged by someone else, not you, buddy. - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you better stop, friendly advice - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So according to you reverting wrongful edits is bad, but threatening other editors is fine? :-D Trasz (talk) 09:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, tracing one editor and stalking them around to revert them, and on top of that, accusing them of wrongful edits is wrong. Very wrong. Study the rules. I don't want to go this route of reporting you, trust me, but you are giving me no choice, hence this last warning. Okay? Find something else to edit. - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is stalking you. Reverting bad edits is a good thing, how one finds them doesn’t matter as long as it results in quality improvement.Trasz (talk) 09:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, that will be decided somewhere else and by somebody else. Don’t force me go that route. STOP following me around. The end. - GizzyCatBella🍁 10:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, stop making politically motivated edits.Trasz (talk) 10:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I really hope you got my message. If you follow me to one more article you never edited before, you know what will happen. - GizzyCatBella🍁 10:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was a good revert on your part actually: [13]; after thinking about I believe I made an error removing it. Thank you for that. HOWEVER - my preceding message still stands. Okay? Thanks - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(June 2, 2021) - Do these two reverts[14],[15] on articles you never edited before, having anything to do with me correcting[16] your distortion of references[17] in this article? (Just a fair warning, if you don't proceed with a convincing answer, I might be ultimately reporting you on the appropriate board in the next 48 hours, bringing within the record an entire history, not only todays incident.) - GizzyCatBella🍁 20:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nasz Dziennik

Please stop restoring citations to predatory journals. These are not reliable sources. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So I googled a bit, and I can’t find the particular venue (International Journal of Arts and Sciences) on predatory journal lists. It does look a bit weird, though. So, what’s the rule; does the source need to be explicitly mentioned somewhere under WP:RSN? Trasz (talk) 20:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look for the publisher / website. E.g. "UniversityPublications.net" in https://beallslist.net/. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can also install WP:UPSD. Not all sources are covered, but it does cover a lot. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I see it. Thanks for explaining it... and sorry for the mess. Trasz (talk) 20:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A semi-centralised place at GAFAM to look for lists of predatory journals and publishers, currently not update since 2017, is:

predatory journals: https://github.com/stop-predatory-journals/stop-predatory-journals.github.io/blob/master/_data/journals.csv
predatory publishers: https://github.com/stop-predatory-journals/stop-predatory-journals.github.io/blob/master/_data/publishers.csv
Discussion = "issues" - with currently nobody handling these seriously: https://github.com/stop-predatory-journals/stop-predatory-journals.github.io/issues

Boud (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Poland 2050, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, center is not a perfectly valid position to add, not without reliable third-party sources. And as positions often are a result of an analyzis of the ideology of a party, let me explain further what the problem is here with adding centrism. Poland 2050 is sourced as having 4 ideologies, these are Pro-Europeanism, which is not unique to any one part of the political spectrum, Christian democracy, which differs a lot depending on how the party views and understands christianity, Environmentalism, which is also not unique to just one part of the political spectrum, although it is mostly found between center and left-wing, especially on the center-left, and lastly there is christian left, quite specifically a leftist interpretation of christianity which is strongly economically interventionist, pro-welfare and socially progressive, this last one is usually found on the center-left, but sometimes also further left. As such, there is nothing here that specifically pulls the party towards the center of the spectrum, and thus you need reliable sources to prove that they are centrist! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accident

Sorry about this [18], I clicked the rollback accidentally while checking my notifications. Volunteer Marek 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I’ve actually did something quite similar just a few minutes earlier, in the same article :-) Trasz (talk) 22:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

You really need to stop making personal attacks and referring to other users' legitimate good faith edits as "vandalism", as you did here and here unless you want to get blocked. Make an effort to offer constructive input into the articles' content. Volunteer Marek 20:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

You have been mentioned here[19]. - GizzyCatBella🍁 05:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI comment

I think this was smart. Wikipedia has a learning curve, and knowing how to defuse situations and avoid escalation is a big part of it. Cheers. François Robere (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Pbritti. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Earl K. Fernandes seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Several of your edits reflect a significant issue of bias (notably the series of three edits beginning here). In the future, refrain from edits or edit summaries that convey inappropriate messages or violate NPOV standards, particularly on articles covering living persons. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should know about

Hey Trasz! There is a conduct case about to be opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. It comes about after this article on distortion by various editors, including GizzyCayBella with whom you are acquainted. You may wish to present evidence of their bias at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence when it opens. 46.215.132.154 (talk) 12:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]