User talk:Tratra22395768

March 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Hankou Railway Station. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New article creation

You've created quite a few articles for individual railway stations. I'm not sure that individually they're notable, or useful. They're only one sentence long. What worries me more is that the railroads themselves don't have articles. It would be a better use of your time to create the articles for the railways first, and then, maybe, the stations. But Wikipedia is much better off if there are larger, useful articles on the railway, than just one-sentence indications of existence for lots of, possibly not notable, individual stations. Shadowjams (talk) 11:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon a second

Hi Tratra. Regarding your recent page creations, are you using a bot or semi-automated tool to assist you in these creations? The edits seem very fast for manual creation. Cheers, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a sidenote would you please remove these templates from your user talk page (or just the categories)? They are adding this page to article categories (or just remove the categories if possible). A user-sub page would be a better place to use as a sandbox. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 08:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tratra, please respond to the messages on your talk page, I notice you ignored the message from Shadowjams above, and from myself. Please do not continue creating pages without addressing concerns. But thanks for dealing with the categories :). - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 13:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked this account indefinitely until you can explain the rapid article creation. You can appeal the block by using {{unblock|your reason here}}. Tim Song (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI regarding mass article creation.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 05:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tratra22395768 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to fill red links and let number of articles goes up

Decline reason:

While we appreciate your enthusiasm, English Wikipedia has policies against using unapproved automatic scripts. Before asking to be unblocked again, it would be wise to read over these policies. Q ^{T C} 11:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And as noted above it would be nice for you to comment on this discussion about your activities. Q ^{T C} 11:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read over WP:INDISCRIMINATE, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: ".. merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." -- œ ^™ 11:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Cn-stalink

Template:Cn-stalink has been nominated for merging with Template:RWS. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 10:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huayan railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huayan railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huayan railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cn-stalink listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Cn-stalink. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Cn-stalink redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Stations of Jinbin Passenger Railway

A tag has been placed on Category:Stations of Jinbin Passenger Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaiyuan West railway station

The article Kaiyuan West railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, couldn't find anything on it besides a few travel guides

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eridian314 (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jinan North railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jinan North railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinan North railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jinan North railway station

Hello, Tratra22395768. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jinan North railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jinan North railway station

Hello, Tratra22395768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jinan North railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Houmen railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Houmen railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houmen railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 11:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jiangkedong railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiangkedong railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiangkedong railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xinlitun railway station

The article Xinlitun railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced minor train station, no line article to redirect it to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]