User talk:Tribe 2

Hello, Tribe 2 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Peter E. James (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Footballer infoboxes

Hi, when you edit a footballer's infobox, please leave in the little arrows that denote a loan period. They help to highlight which club the player was on loan from, and in any case they are standard use across the thousands of footballer articles so a discussion is required to remove them. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weymouth F.C.

Hi, the reason I've been rearranging the order of players in the Current squad section is because they ought to be ordered by position, then alphabetically; if it's done just by position, they end up in a seemingly random order. Also, it's not convention to include reserve teams on club articles, and in any case, it isn't cited by a reliable source. And regarding the ordering of personnel in the Club officals section, it would seem logical to place footballing personnel (e.g. Reserve manager) above non-footballing personnel (e.g. Facilities manager). I think that section needs trimming anyway; for example, Birmingham City F.C.#Current staff (an article that has attained good article status) only includes senior footballing personnel. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tribe 2, it's nice to have editors who are passionate about their club but you must not claim ownership of articles, even if you create the article (which you didn't) you don't own it, anyone is entitled to edit them. I'm glad you stopped changing Kyle Critchell's flag as you were in violation of MOSFLAG & you also resisted from unlinking some of the players as that also violated WP:UNDERLINK. But as for the ordering of players, where players don't have squad no.s they should be ordered by position, then alphabetically not solely by position. This widely accepted as we don't just have this issue with non league clubs, but also with the SFL ones. If you have any questions don't hesitate in contacting me or Matty on our talkpages. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again your claiming ownership: so just leave this non league club alone and go sort out someone else's, & you also gave a misleading edit summary as you claimed to revert GiantSnowman but also revert me & restored an incorrect ordering method I suggest you stop. If you wish for the reserve squad to be included I suggest you discuss at the article talk page. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Weymouth F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Weymouth F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Weymouth F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Weymouth F.C., without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MaloneyW.F.C for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Giant Snowman 09:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of MaloneyW.F.C (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]