User talk:Tsunamishadow

Welcome!

Hello, Tsunamishadow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Tsunamishadow}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Buckethead Taskforce?

You are invited to join the Buckethead task force, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Buckethead. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 11:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question...?

{{helpme}} Why aren't internet retail stores a reliable source for information such as release dates? tsunamishadow (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because Interent retail stores do not have a reputation for rigorous research, fact checking and accuracy. They do not have the same kind of stake in making sure information is reliable because their goal is to sell a product (which sometimes mean they have a stake in distorting information to make products seem better than they actually are in various ways). Newspapers, authors of books, historical societies, etc. are selling a product too, but it is an information product, with them standing behind the information. A retail site selling a toy train provides product information details about the toy because people don't buy products without information on them, but they are selling the toy train, not the information. Moreover, information products are often written by people trained in providing information; researchers, librarians, journalists. So ask yourself: Who's writing the blurb accompanying the toy train and what procedures are in place to make sure it's accurate?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for the two barnstars, I appreciate them. Oh, and you assumed correctly, though I have been referred to as a "she" on countless occasions. :) Best wishes. Acalamari 16:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HELP CREATING NEW BARNSTAR!

{{helpme}}

As seen on the left is an image I created/edited using other images already on Wikipedia. So now I need help on two things.

1. I need someone to touch-up the image. It is not transparent (you can see the black backround that should be removed) and make it look better attributing everyone who made the images including me and whoever manages to touch it up.
2. Putting it in Wikipedia:Barnstars as a template.

Here's a description of what it should be awarded for:

The Music Barnstar may be awarded to editors who make significant contribution(s) to Music related pages such as Artists and/or Songs. Which may not fit under criteria from The Audio Barnstar. Please help! tsunamishadow (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point us to the source files please, it'd be a hassle to create the outline otherwise (i.e. your export settings were most likely wrong). - Alexandru.rosu (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by 'source files' but I'll try to answer it. File:Musical note nicu bucule 01.svg and File:Original Barnstar.png are the two files I used to make this picture. If you meant the file that I made, then that is the only one that I have uploaded, so you can get it from there. Thanks for answering by the way! tsunamishadow (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's what I needed. You can find a version of the musical Barnstar here (only the preview has a black background). It's a remake of yours (was trialling pixlr.com). I'll redo yours shortly (haven't got a proper image editor here). What did you use? Can't you export png's with tranparency?- Alexandru.rosu (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no, which is the reason I asked. I used MS Paint with Microsoft Photo Premium 10 to get as far as I could. I am aware there are some programs that are able to do .png with transparency but I have no intention of buying or stealing these programs. Added to that if I did have the program I wouldn't have been able to make the transparency that well. Also thanks to the speedy response, feel free to take your time, this isn't on my need to do right now list. tsunamishadow (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should try Paint.NET, it's free and quite good actually. btw, I updated the image (use the above link), hope it's alright. Regarding the template, I have no clue, sorry. - Alexandru.rosu (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar :D. Alexandru.rosu (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar template creation

{{helpme}}

I want to make a new Barnstar Template...I just don't know how. Help... Also read above before answering the actual picture has already been made.

Just copy the coding from an existing barnstar and replace the text accordingly. Here's the coding for the "Original barnstar", all you need to do is replace the title and image:

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Original_Barnstar.png|100px]] |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | {{{1}}} |}

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 15:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Legal Question

I'm confused about the laws and rules coinciding the upload of movie files with the subject of video games, can someone tell me if is allowed legally to:

1. Upload a movie showing gameplay of a non-free commercial game, even if it is short (time), low resolution and low quality.
2. Upload a movie of a tralier or short movie which MAY show gameplay of a non-free commercial game, even if it is short (time), low resolution and low quality.

I'm asking this, so I don't do something stupid and get kicked of Wikipedia.

Hello Tsunamishadow, yes, it'd be legally acceptable, but from what I understand, the norm is that we don't create video game videos here. –blurpeace ^(talk) 15:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:TsunamishadowPhantomHourglassrecord.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TsunamishadowPhantomHourglassrecord.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Orange Sky (band)

A tag has been placed on The Orange Sky (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHO FIDDLED WITH THE TEMPLATES?!

{{helpme}} If you look at my user page you could see that everything seems to be put in one big table (box) aligned to the right side of the page. I can only assume that someone fiddled with I template somewhere on Wikipedia that I have used on my user page. Could someone either fix the template OR my user page, thank you. Or at least tell me how to fix it.

The userboxes should be on the right and main written bit should be placed normally. tsunamishadow (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Click here to see what was wrong with the page. Seems like moving the {{Userboxbottom}} to the bottom solved the issue. Ilyushka88 talk 18:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All the Right Wrongs

Please do not remove sourced genre information as you did at All the Right Wrongs. Such editing constitutes original research and genre-warring, which are both discouraged here. Chase wc ⁹¹ 16:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tsunamishadow for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Chase wc ⁹¹ 22:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bear (film)

A tag has been placed on Bear (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 23:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi Tsunamishadow. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Is it possible to rollback to a previous version of a page, of which has had recent multiple vandalisms by different users?

Also I'm confused how to rollback to a previous version when vandalisms have been made by one author. I know it can be done, but I don't see how...

Rollback reverts all edits by the most recent editor, so the answer to your first question is "no". To rollback when one editor has vandalized, click "rollback" next to the edit on the article's history page. Xenon54 / talk / 17:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Grohl images

Yo Tsunamishadow, you asked on Commons about replacing File:DaveGrohlphoto crop.jpg with an image you made. I'm not sure quite what you mean – there is enough room on commons for as many free images of Grohl as you want to upload. If you mean you want to use your image instead of mine in the Wikipedia articles then that's fine by me (though other editors could possibly object). So feel free to go right ahead, and remember to release your images under a free licence such as Creative Commons 3.0. Regards, Astrojunta. 23:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foo Fighters

There are some serious issues with the sourcing: setlist.fm does not appear reliable, and I don't think we can use a youtube video as a source under any circumstances. Also, very few of the sources are formatted properly. I have failed the GA for now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 1st

Are we allowed to do any April Fools' jokes on Wikipedia? And if we are, what can and can they not be?

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured here.

There's no exact rules, but obviously nothing disruptive (such as changing a live article, etc). Have you read today's Main page? And there is an interesting 'request for adminship'. For more, see Wikipedia:April fools. Chzz ► 09:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For more help, you can either;

Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
Talk to us live, with this or this.

The last of those is particularly useful - please try it; pop in now and say hello. Chzz ► 09:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Awarded for valor in the reversion of vandalism. Spitfire19 (Talk) 14:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nontheism

See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.

Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Octavariumfullcircleextract.OGG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Octavariumfullcircleextract.OGG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lzivsleeve1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lzivsleeve1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lzsleeve2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lzsleeve2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tsunamishadow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some WikiLove

Cookies!

HeartGlow30797 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Hey, I see you have been discouraged and would love to thank you for all your hard work! Keep going and if you need any help, contact me on my talk page! HeartGlow ^(talk) 02:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Proposed deletion of File:Friends169.jpg

The file File:Friends169.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friends169.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Friends169.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]