User talk:TyMega

Welcome!

Hello, TyMega, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minae Noji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleeping Dogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erik King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stay Tuned (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Graham McTavish. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Do not bypass redirect to sections - see WP:NOTBROKEN Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Graham McTavish

Please review WP:NOTBROKEN - FlightTime (open channel) 13:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically Shortcuts or redirects to embedded anchors or sections of articles or of Wikipedia's advice pages should never be bypassed, as the anchors or section headings on the page may change over time. Updating one redirect is far more efficient than updating dozens of piped links. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at James Marsters, you may be blocked from editing. You seem to have some kind of campaign against the plain wording of WP:NOTBROKEN about not bypassing valid redirects to sections. You are aware of this and still choose to ignore it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Graham McTavish shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Persisting in edit warring to create a violation of guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Graham McTavish. See WP:NOTBROKEN and all the messages about this on your talk page Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to stop using table 'rowspan' in ways that violate WP:ACCESSIBILITY – best choice: don't use 'rowspan' at all. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Graham McTavish

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anime filmographies

Please leave "resume", "Tweet" and other self-pub references in the column. They show the main reference that confirms the person's role in the show or game. If you find better ones, like a screen credit or a news article/cast announcement, you can replace it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Dobson (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Little Pony: The Movie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the rowspans please

It violates WP:ACCESSIBILITY. You have been advised of this previously, yet continue to use them improperly. Discontinue their usage. Thank you and have a pleasant day. --Ebyabe (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Wikipedia is a collaborative environment. To date, you have not responded to any communications on your talk page, or made any responses on any user or article talk page. Please do not ignore people trying to contact you. Thanks. --Ebyabe (talk) 19:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Marsters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ebyabe (talk) 06:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IOW, don't use "undue line spacing" in Filmography tables. And follow "WP:FILMOGRAPHY best practices". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're also doing the same thing at Ruth Negga – knock it off. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikey Kelley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transformers: Robots in Disguise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

American sock-puppet

Sock-puppet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.201.183 (talk) 08:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, hello?

Is there anybody there? Bueller? Bueller? --Ebyabe (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alanna Ubach

Could you please explain the series of edits you made to the lede of this article? You deleted, restored, deleted, moved, restored, etc., the same information over and over again, finally ending with a version of the lede that is essentially the same as the one that you started with. Grandpallama (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Graham McTavish. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Corey Burton, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You're obviously ignoring warnings about rowspans on purpose, and have no good reason to disregard such notices. Please desist from adding them into filmography tables. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto: you've warned about this for months and months – do it again, and I'll be going straight to WP:AIV asking for a block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Others vs. others in voice actor filmographies

Do not specify "Others" as the character role unless the game title lists the role "Others" in the credits. It should be lower case, "Jack, Bob, others" The lower-case "others" implies there are many other roles that aren't additional voices that he has voiced for that title. If all his characters are minor but titled then that's where I have used "Various characters". I've had to clean that up on Travis Willingham filmography. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John DiMaggio. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change "others" to "Others" or "Various characters" to "Various". Do not add roles that are unsourced. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John DiMaggio, you may be blocked from editing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:07, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Blum. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN

Per WP:NOTBROKEN, you don't need to convert Wikipedia characters links to their List of X characters components. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TyMega. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cristina Vee. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop messing with the linking of the characters. Read WP:NOTBROKEN AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 08:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cristina Vee, you may be blocked from editing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're making a lot of major changes, please discuss them first

Please refrain from making major edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Graham McTavish, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a major change. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Bauza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electric City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Fennoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Men in White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave B. Mitchell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tin Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Erica Luttrell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Emily Bett Rickards. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Maurice LaMarche‎ does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Alan Tudyk, you may be blocked from editing. Railfan23 (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corey Burton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page God of War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Adams (American actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NICKNAME

Please do not add nicknames to leads in violation of MOS:NICKNAME. I see that you've been blocked before for disruptive editing, so please don't start editing disruptively again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiffany Haddish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hank Azaria, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adam J. Harrington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Showtime

Kevin Michael Richardson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zarkon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TyMega, you need to stop disrupting the roles listed in Dee Bradley Baker filmography. The credits should only list the character names as to how they are printed in the credits, so Etrigan should be credited as "Jason Blood / Etrigan". Do not add characters that are not verified by BTVA screenshots. If they do not have the green checkmark that go to a screenshot, then don't add the character. They are commented out for that reason. Do not remove links to episodes. Do not place "Various Animals" if the screen credit does not say that. Do not add Additional Voices. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 20:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Ruff's birth date

If you're so adamant on making sure that Michelle Ruff's birthday and age has a citation, then why didn't you just find one yourself that had the day of birth instead of just erasing the previous birthday/age, and calling it a day? Steveman 723 (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just as I thought: your a coward and a phony who himself doesn't want to put in the effort and find a citation for a birth date and say it's irrelevant while proving my belief that you only want to add and fix what you want to see and not the importance of the person's relevance. Steveman 723 (talk) 06:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just as I thought: your a coward and a phony who himself doesn't want to put in the effort and find a citation for a birth date and say it's irrelevant while proving my belief that you only want to add and fix what you want to see and not the importance of the person's relevance. Steveman 723 (talk) 06:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corey Burton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page God of War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image: Tricia Helfer

Normally, the infobox doesn't need the full wiki-markup. You can just put the file name in the infobox. Please see my edit here for an example of what I mean. †dismas†|^(talk) 14:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Marie Cabanos

Why are you removing so many references from Christine Marie Cabanos? Schazjmd (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that cite tweet currently has an issue concerning website, which should be fixed later. You do not need to mess around with existing tweets. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cristina Vee, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Burton

I'm deeply sorry for any unconstructive edits. Will you please unblock my accounts? TyMega (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]