User talk:UYBS

Hello, UYBS! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 22:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chronic fatigue syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signing

Hi UYBS, just a quick note to let you know the 4 tildies don't work for signing in edit summaries. Only sign after your comments on discussion pages. Ward20 (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alternative_names_for_chronic_fatigue_syndrome. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are currently at 3 reverts within 24 hours for this article. sciencewatcher (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on my talk page

Are you on the right page? my last edit to your talk page was on 9 June 2010 on the topic signing. Ward20 (talk) 01:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the history of this talk page, and the "there is no Lord" comment at the end of the section on yours, that was obviously meant for WLU, not you. —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I see the deleted section, Thanks. Ward20 (talk) 12:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that per the talk page guidelines deleting a comment is taken as an indication that it has been read (see the final bullet in WP:TPO).

Also, your general behaviour of stomping about like an angry mastadon gives every indication that you will eventually face a short, then escalating series of blocks. Usually, this sort of behaviour, if not changed, ends up in a full ban. If you want to be blocked, continue, but if you want to contribute you need to listen to what other editors have to say. It all makes sense when you get it, but if you're determined to use wikipedia to promote just your perspective on CFS, it will end badly. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 14:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal Attacks

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

I realize that the various CFS articles can be frustrating to work on at times, especially with all the different points of view, but edit summaries that refer to other editors as "stupid" and "nutters" are likely to get you blocked if you continue. Just because people don't share your point of view doesn't mean that they're either of those things. —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]