Jump to content

User talk:Uabbas92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Uabbas92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Howicus (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uabbas92, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Uabbas92! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pakistan

[edit]
Welcome!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Mar4d (talk) 17:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Zumrad khan (August 16)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

You need to start a new section at the bottom of talk:Pakistan International Airlines stating what is in dispute. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 07:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about wp:edit warring. Naveed245, unlike you, has not been leaving any edit summaries nor responding to your requests for discussion. Also removing sourced content (without edit summaries). I left an EW notice on Naveed245's talk page. I wold suggest wp:dispute resolution. It can be slow, so be patient. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend talking to Naveed re this issue. Communications can solve many problems. Jim1138 (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He would appear to not be communicating. I am too tired to figure out what's going on with PIA. It seem like you are removing some of his cites and viceversa. So I don't see what's going on. I suggest you carefully follow wp:dispute resolution. Make sure you provide evidence in terms of wp:diffs so that other editors looking at your dispute resolution request can do so with a minimum of work. Beware of WP:PETARD Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm linking actual sources (I.e. company) and he's posting outdated information. For example, PIA has 2 A320 aircraft and ordered 8. I provided sources for it. But he removes it and puts 10 aircraft on order. At the top of the page, it says list sources or information will be removed. Ironically, I put sources, it gets removed. What gives? Also I'm not removing his cites. He's reverting back to information I had put PRIOR. All the citation in that section (for fleet amount) were listed by me. Source 29, 30, 31 and 32 were posted by me. Now the information is old, except source 32. I want to change it. Also, if you look at his history, he posts different versions every time. He posted that PIA had ordered 8 aircrafts (4 ATR and 4 Boeing 777). No citation was given. I looked up in google for citation. Found out that he got his info from fan page of PIA (People post there random aircraft in PIA livery). So I change that. Now he edits the page back to some 1 or 2 month ago old. Give him a ban for a week so he knows we're trying to communicate. When he'd try to change cited work and it gives him an error, he'd read up warnings he had been given.
I would think that if s/he didn't respond, you would "win". So, open a ticket! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]