User talk:Uli Kunkel

A simple request: don't be a dick. "Being right about an issue does not mean you're not being a dick yourself! Dicks can be right — but they're still dicks; if there's something in what they say that is worth hearing, it goes unheard, because no one likes listening to dicks, no matter how right they are."--Uli Kunkel 21:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roguegeek, please stop stalking my user page. I don't mind your menial clean-ups on articles, but I don't welcome your comments here.--Uli Kunkel 23:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are used for discussion. Roguegeek (talk) 23:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page: "Archiving of one's own user talk page is not needed. A user may simply delete any comments they have read, whether they have acted on them or not."

Consider this comment a warning; discussion over.--Uli Kunkel 00:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scary. Roguegeek (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your activites (especially those on this page) are not going unnoticed.--Uli Kunkel 02:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV post

Uli Kunkel, I have removed your AIV post. Roguegeek is not vandalising, although his tone could perhaps be friendlier. MOS doesn't like links in section headers. It's not really that big a deal, anyway. The best thing to do is to leave the section header linkless, then place this template below the header: {{main|Name of article you want to link to}}. If you continue to revert, I'm afraid I will have to look at blocking you for 3RR. Please be reasonable about this, it's not really a huge issue. If you have any questions, you can ask here. Thanks, – riana_dzasta 02:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but what about edits to this talk page?--Uli Kunkel 02:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's been warning you about your edits. You can't really ask an editor not to edit your talk page, because it doesn't really belong to you :) But I understand, and hopefully all will be OK now. – riana_dzasta 02:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of Roguegeek's changes here had nothing to do with my edits on articles but were reversions and demands that I archive the talk page, which according to the how-to page: "Archiving of one's own user talk page is not needed. A user may simply delete any comments they have read, whether they have acted on them or not." His repeated changes can only be interpreted as harassment, since they are clearly against the guideline I just quoted.--Uli Kunkel 04:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's that, then. Thanks at least for providing a glimpse as to how users like Essjay are able to run amok for so long. My wikipedia time's up, suspicions confirmed.--Uli Kunkel 16:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]