User talk:Untruc1981

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, Untruc1981, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Aboutmovies

Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg, which you've attributed to Razorcake. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Razorcake may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

latimes.com/2001/jun/03/magazine/tm-5872 "Bulletin From The Mosh Pit"] latimes.com 3 June 2001]</ref>
*The Hex Dispensers]– ''Sister Series'' 7” (paired with Young Offenders)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Razorcake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repo Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files: 5 Razorcake magazine covers

Several files that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because their copyright statuses are unclear or disputed. If these files' copyright statuses cannot be verified, they may be deleted. You may find more information on the files' description pages. You are welcome to add comments to their entries at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 April 26 if you object to these listing for any reason. The best outcome is to use the OTRS process to document that you are either the copyright owner or the copyright owner's legal representative.

The files in question are:

I have also marked the two videos you uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons as needing permission. If you do not provide evidence that the copyright owner released them under a Commons-compatible license or evidence that you are the copyright owner or his legal representative, they will likely be deleted in a week. See your Commons talk page for more information. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Carswell

There's no problem about recreating the article. As long as you include multiple independent references from reliable sources (ie. sources other than Sean's own website or his publisher's website) to demonstrate notability, you are free to do that any time. Deb (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Carswell (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Sean Carswell.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JustBerry (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Untruc1981, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sean Carswell

Draft:Sean Carswell, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sean Carswell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sean Carswell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JustBerry (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

When wikilinking a phrase, wikilink the whole thing or don't wikilink at all. You recently changed the phrase "Thomas Pynchon scholar" into "Thomas Pynchon scholar". If there was an article about the Thomas Pynchon scholar program or the Thomas Pynchon scholarship, you could wikilink to that, but do not wikilink to Thomas Pynchon. The exception would be if the scholarship or scholar program were actually discussed in the article about the person. In that case, you could wikilink to the section that discussed it. For example, IF there was a section called "Scholarship program" in the article about Mr. Pynchon, you could wikilink to Thomas Pynchon#Scholarship program. For the sake of clarity, you may wish to "pipe" the link, like so: [[Thomas Pynchon#Scholarship program|Thomas Pynchon scholar]]. This will display as Thomas Pynchon scholar and will go directly to the "Scholarship program" section of the page if that section exists. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Carswell (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Sean Carswell.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 04:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Carswell (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Here's why:

The author's books are in only 4 or 5 libraries each, according to WorldCat, Please do not submit this again, until there are much better sources to show notability''

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sean Carswell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sean Carswell, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Razorcake Issue 77 Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]