User talk:UserHerName

Welcome!

Hello, UserHerName, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 08:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Lungfish are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Rhinopias (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Novitzky

Youtube cannot be regarded as a reliable source. Please do not re-add this content w/o discussion on talk page. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dmy dates

You removed a "Use dmy dates" tag here saying "remove outdated tag". But that tag doesn't go out of date: it's a permanent message for editors of the article. The date it was added is useful, as it shows whether it was in place when a particular edit was made. So please just leave these tags alone in future. Thanks. PamD 10:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources. (For the difference between primary and secondary sources, see WP:MEDDEF.)
Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS). High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
More generally see WP:MEDHOW
Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities.
Do not use URLs from your university library's internal net: the rest of the world cannot see them.
Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article.
Please format citations consistently within an article and be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books; see WP:MEDHOW for how to format citations.
Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team--Jytdog (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your recent editing history at Jeff Novitzky shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Marianna251TALK 10:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 11:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jeff Novitzky. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the words of Admiral Stockdale: who am I and why am I here?

Hi. I'd like to put to rest your confusion. You'll note when I posted to Marianna's talk page, my comment was prefaced by a link to Wikipedia:Talk page stalker. You should read that. I have almost 10,000 pages on my watchlist and I often chime in on user talk pages when it find it necessary. For example, you can often find me commenting at User talk:Oshwah, among others. Wikipedia is connected in that way. Neither Marianna nor anyone else calls me to their talk page, I just show up. There's no conspiracy against you. I've interacted with Marianna for more than a year so when you showed up making complaints about edit-warring, I checked it out. I reverted your edit on Jeff Novitzky back to status quo ante which is the norm while discussion is ongoing, and I made a note at WP:ANEW that you made another reversion in 24hours, which is in violation of WP:EW. The message I addressed to you from her talk page was a recommendation to back off, as you had already earned a block and continuing this behavior would make it certain. Marianna is a very nice, patient editor and she's given you a break on that violation. I hope you choose to work with her in finding consensus. I'm sure you're excited about Big Brown making the golden snitch comment about Novitzky and the discussion on JRE, but all of that is really only of interest to fans. Wikipedia takes a much broader scope and you need real sources that show us there's actual coverage about the nickname. Just because Joe Rogan talks about it doesn't make it notable. Just because people listen to a podcast doesn't make that a worthy source, either. This may seem unfair to you but we run into all kinds of fans on a regular basis and we always get to this point of explaining why we're not accepting what you'd like to contribute. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.

Both Marianna251 and Chris Troutman have assumed a lot of good faith when dealing with your comments and your recent accusations of meat puppetry and canvassing at WP:ANEW were far out of line. Only out of respect for Chris, who again calmly explained the situation to you, I'm leaving it at a final warning now. Next time, you will be blocked. Regards So Why 14:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note you have left a kind of apology on ANEW, which is a good start. Remember though, insinuating that someone might have incited another user to edit-war or !vote in their favor without any kind of proof and despite being told multiple times that it was mere coincidence can be a personal attack as well. Stepping away from the topic for a while seems like the best idea. Regards So Why 14:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy I will keep that in mind for the future. I am willing to settle it with Marianna and Chris, with a sincere apology. I want to move on from this. I just hope @Marinna251 and @Chris_Troutman can both accept my apology, I am genuinely being serious about it, I am sorry to both of them. UserHerName (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Namak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Spamming

I appreciate that you want to keep the integrity of articles, especially those of BLPs such as Adnan Sami, but please don't use this account to spam others. My last edit to that page was **7 years ago** which indicates this account is a bot or a very weird user.

David Warner infobox

Hello. Yes it is complex. But Warner didn't play for Peshawar Zalmi in any season that I can see. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]