User talk:Valentfred
Welcome!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Valentfred! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marcus Qwertyus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Marcus Qwertyus 00:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Changing heights and weights
[edit]Please read WP:BLP. You must provide reliable sources when you make changes to an article of a living person. That includes changing heights and weights. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Cody Rhodes appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please don't change sourced information, such as height, especially not without providing a reliable source for verification. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 05:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cody Rhodes, you may be blocked from editing. Stop changing sourced information. Per his WWE bio, Rhodes is 6 ft 2 in. Do not change this again.
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Roddy Piper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SQGibbon (talk) 06:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=I just tested the accuracy of sources that provide by Wikipedia. So, I watch wrestling matches, analyze their heights and weights, then make decisions if I need to change them or not. So, I'm begging you to unblock my account. I promise I'll search for the sources first then consider if the contents fit to the sources or not before change them}}
Valentfred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
user request
Accept reason:
User has been in contact with unblock-en and has further had the explanation about citing sources and is willing to comply with editing requirements. Blocking admin was contacted via email for comment, none eventuated. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
January 2012
[edit]I've reverted this edit you made to Kevin Nash as the alterations you made to his height and weight did not match those quoted by the citation used (Nash's WWE profile). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 16:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit] This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jinder Mahal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 18:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Unreliable sources
[edit]Valentfred, I noticed that you have been adding moves to various wrestlers' movesets. While that is commendable, I have two areas of concern. Firstly, you have cited the moves with sources such as allwrestlingnews, wrestlingattitude and yardbarker which are not confirmed as reliable sources. If you use unreliable sources, the information you added can be removed freely at any time. I would advise you consult the list of reliable sources provided by WP:PW. In particular, I find the most useful sources for moves to be PWTorch, PWInsider and Wrestleview. Secondly, one must note that signature moves should be moves that a wrestler uses regularly and repeatedly. One should not simply add a move to a wrestlers' moveset the first time he does it. What if he only does it once his whole career? How would that be considered a signature move? I would very much appreciate a reply to confirm your understanding of these matters, and I thank you for your edits to improve movesets. Starship.paint (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Serena Deeb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sailing vessel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Multiple uses of same reference
[edit]As I noticed with Seth Rollins, to use one reference for multiple parts of the article, please do avoid copying and pasting the entire reference every time as it clogs up the page and adds to the page size. Instead, give the reference a ref name... [1] instead of Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). for the first use of the reference, and for subsequent references just use [1] without the need for </ref> or anything else in between Starship.paint (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
WP:MMA
[edit]Hello,
i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!
Kevlar (talk) 01:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Wrestler heights
[edit]I see you're back to your old habit of changing wrestler heights without providing a source. If you continue this, you will end up being blocked once again... Tabercil (talk) 22:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Signature moves
[edit]Hello Valentfred, I noticed you've been adding signature moves to several wrestlers' pages. While I do appreciate your contributions to the pages, I'd like to point you out to a recent discussion the WP:PW group had here. Please do that the time to read through and understand our rationale. You can continue the discussion as well if you wish. We're kinda concerned that there are listings of supposed signature moves that are used once, twice or are really common moves, and it would be great if you could take into account that rationale when adding signature moves. Thank you! Starship.paint (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC) As per edit on Heath Slater... I'd like to make our stance clearer. If you want to add signature moves, try to get a reliable source that explicitly says it is a signature move, or get at least three reliable sources showing that X has performed Y, in this case, Heath Slater has performed the back heel kick. Of course, the three sources should not be three reports of the same show. The rationale is that we want to make sure that the signature moves are not moves the wrestler used once, twice. Please add more sources, thanks. Starship.paint (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trent Barreta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jake Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:38, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dustin Rhodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalkaska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mason Ryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piledriver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Ted DiBiase Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 14:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Great Khali. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I see from your talk page you have a history of making unsourced changes to heights/weights - please stop or you will be blocked again. noq (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chavo Guerrero Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. still making unsourced changes in contradiction to sources - continue and be blocked again. noq (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Charles Wright (wrestler) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to University of Nevada
- Sylvester Lefort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jake Carter
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Unreliable sources
[edit]I can tell you're editing in good faith with such edits, but please, stop using WrestlingInc / Cageside Seats etc, they are not reliable sources. Please use PWTorch or PWInsider for sourcing. Thank you. Starship.paint (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Here is the list of reliable sources accepted by WikiProject:Professional Wrestling right now. We only add sources according to the list. Any sources not on the list are not "cleared" and thus are unreliable. The list was debated over by various WP:PW members. If you wish to add WrestlingInc or CagesideSeats, that is fine, but the approval process is only by proposing it at the WP:PW talk page. You propose a new topic on the talk page, we debate whether to accept it as a reliable source. Got that? Starship.paint (talk) 03:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Show, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Torn and Labrum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to CM Punk. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. STATic message me! 21:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Usos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- of Funk. On June 24th episode of ''RAW,'' The Usos were successfuly defeated Tons of Funk and 3MB ([[Drew McIntyre]] and [[Jinder Mahal]] to be #1 contenders for [[WWE Tag Team Championship]] at [[
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
[edit] Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chris Jericho. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned about this behavior many times before. Please stop. SQGibbon (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
El Generico
[edit]Read the El Generico edit history and what Starship Paint wrote. One source isn't enough to establish a signature move. You've been told this about 200 times already. And read WP:PW/SG, I don't know what the fuck Daily Wrestling News is, but it certainly is not a reliable source.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- "I don't care about the rules". That sort of attitude will get you blocked from editing in an instant. If he's using the moves so often it shouldn't be that difficult to give four sources for them.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Your recent editing history at El Generico shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 14:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CM Punk. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. STATic message me! 02:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
This is ridiculous. I reverted your edit due to WP:LINKVIO, and you straight up revert? That's seriously not on. Allow me to further explain for you, since you seem to have spectacularly missed the point. Wikipedia cannot link to sites that violate somebody's copyright. In this cases, the youtube videoes have been uploaded by people who are not WWE. WWE owns the copyright to their tv shows and ppvs. They ddi not upload the vidoes, therefore the uploaders are violating WWE copyright, and wikipedia does not link to them. If you'd like to find some valid references, feel free to re-add the moves, but until then, no. I notice you have a long history of disruption; I sugest you develop some cop-on before you find yourself blocked. NiciVampireHeart 11:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Luke Harper
[edit]Once again, as decided by the Wikiproject, the minimum is FOUR. I added one for Gator roll, so that's OK, the rest aren't.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 17:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- If the source specifically says that a move is a signature move, then that's OK. That's what we're trying to do, establish that these are signature moves and not just moves done once or twice.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sons of Anarchy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.67.170.169.30 (talk) 07:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Accessdate / date problem
[edit]As seen from your edits like this one, you added a source, great, thank you, but in the access date, you are leaving out the year, only "September 13" instead of "September 13, 2013". It has been causing Category:CS1 errors: dates in many articles. Please stop making this mistake, thanks. Starship.paint (talk) 08:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- I already told you already, and you are making the same mistake! Look at your edits here and here. Look at the accessdates! You left out the year again! Like I said before, you are causing each article to be sorted into the Category:CS1 errors: dates by not including the year. Starship.paint (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please watch this video. It will tell you how to use the Wikipedia citation tool, which automatically provides the accessdate with one click. Starship.paint (talk) 08:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- this edit. Could you stop forgetting the year in the source? Watch the above video I linked to! Starship.paint (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please watch this video. It will tell you how to use the Wikipedia citation tool, which automatically provides the accessdate with one click. Starship.paint (talk) 08:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shad Gaspard, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. COMMENT: I have seen you several times in the past, and your talk page reinforced the fact that you have a habit of adding improperly sourced material and then reverting it back when it gets undone. You need to stop this habit now. Any further reverts will be considered vandalism. Antoshi ☏ ★ 03:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Goldust. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. STATic message me! 19:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. starship.paint (talk | contribs) 02:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 19:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 01:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Valentfred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please, unblock my account. I realized for whatever wrongdoings I have done since I started editing articles as I wished. I apologize for all of it, I will be obedient to all rules attained in Wikipedia if I want to make some editings from now on
Decline reason:
You'll need a much more comprehensive request here. You've already lied to have an indefinite block lifted. You've also recently declared that the normal "rules of editing" do not apply to you and then evaded your block with a sock account. This request does little to assure me that your world view has changed. Kuru (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Valentfred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay then, I admitted all that stuff you wrote. I guarantee you I won't do anything diverge from the rules. You can prove it youself by watching my works and I will obey to the rules then, I realized the importance of those rules for the betterment of Wikipedia. Last but not least, I will not use another account, I'm starting to use ValentSamuel account. This account will be deactivated.
Decline reason:
User has not clearly demonstrated an understanding of why the account is blocked. Merely saying "I plan to follow the rules" doesn't show us you know what you did wrong the first time and what you'll avoid this time. only (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You lied to us. Why should we trust you? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Valentfred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I hereby request for my account to be unblocked, because of following reasons: Since my misconducts had always been about wrongly cited editings on 'signature moves section', I realized that Wikipedia has decided to remove 'signature moves' section of all wrestlers page. Therefore, I can assure all of you that such cases in the past will not happen again, even if Wikipedia decided to revive the 'signature moves section' again, because I am not going to edit often anymore. My mission on here will only to correct or undo any incorrect stories/historical remarks of a page, for example, from what I found in Yujiro Takahashi's championship and accomplishments section. All listed championships are wrong that encourages me to undo all the editing histories, because I have necessary references to support my claim
Decline reason:
You lied to us. You engaged in sockpuppetry to evade your block. You are talking only about the content of your edits, but the problems you demonstrated went far beyond that. Yamla (talk) 17:36, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Valentfred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I assure you all that I will not use any sockpuppetry. The real reason I used the other account was because I was frustrated that my past unblock requests had been denied while I was still keen to contribute. But, from now on, I promise I will conduct all my edits professionally, obediently and I will never use any sock puppet accounts. If I am allowed, you can conduct thorough check on my first edit to see if I violate the rules or not. If I happen to violate the rules again on my first try, I promise I will not submit any unblock requests anymore and I will not return to contribute on Wikipedia anymore.
Decline reason:
Still no evidence that you have any understanding of the policies and guidelines you were violating. Saying "I'll follow the rules" doesn't tell us that you know what the rules are. Given that you have repeated this approach in every unblock above (and based on your track record) I see no likelihood that will change, so I have revoked your access to edit this page. Yunshui 雲水 07:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.