User talk:vandaso

Your submission at Articles for creation: RLoop (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RLoop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 01:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Vandaso! Thank you for your contributions. I am N2e and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! N2e (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Hi Vandaso.

I recommend you read, or reread, WP:COI.
Then, after consideration, I recommend that you revert your own edits you made today to the Hyperloop pod competition article. The process on the Talk page is moving along nicely, and I think rLoop can be better represented on the Hpc page very soon.

Lastly, just to be clear, I'm not trying to "own" the page there at Hpc, noone does that on Wikipedia! But I do know that the COI guidelines on Wikipedia have emerged after many years of trial and error and also the development of community standards. Given that I've recently written emails to over 20 Hpc teams in the competition, I suspect it is good if any non-Hpc-involved editors on the page take a standard and balanced approach to COI, and apply it equally to all comers. Cheers. N2e (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I say your comment on my Talk page. Thanks for that.

But just because you are new to Wikipedia and want to learn, normally you should probably just answer any items on the same talk page the discussion was started on. If mine, then I would reply on mine. If your, I would reply on yours. If you don't hear back in a few days, then take additional measures. Cheers. N2e (talk) 04:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RLoop (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment they left was:

Sentences are not netural enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RLoop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 23:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vandaso, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 23:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:RLoop

Hello, Vandaso. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "RLoop".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]