User talk:Vanished user 013316
This is Vanished user 013316's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
If you would like to talk, please do so.
Ecks Dey, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Ecks Dey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC) |
A page you started (Tommykaira ZZII) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Tommykaira ZZII, Ecks Dey!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful article! Please do not use
&
's in headings, instead use the wordand
.
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Elliot321 (talk) 21:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Felino CB7) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Felino CB7, Ecks Dey!
Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I have added the missing categories for you. Please consider adding a royalty-free photo or one you made yourself to the article
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017–18 Vegas Golden Knights season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ecks Dey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ecks Dey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Rich Energy Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The company doesn't meet the notability criteria as per WP:CORP. The only things getting coverage about this company is their sponsorship of an Formula 1 team and losing a copyright case for their logo. In both cases the coverage is more because of F1 team rather than the company.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Ssk talk 15:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Ways to improve 2019 FIA GTC season
[edit]Hello, Ecks Dey,
Thank you for creating 2019 FIA GTC season.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add more independent coverage (not from the FIA or Gran Turismo) to strengthen the page.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.